Tesla CEO Elon Musk trolled the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in a tweet Thursday afternoon, poking the bear that just days before had agreed to settle securities fraud charges against the billionaire entrepreneur.

The tweet, sent out at 1:16 pm PT Thursday, says:

&Just want to that the Shortseller Enrichment Commission is doing incredible work. And the name change is so on point!&

elon musk trolls sec twitter

The SEC declined to comment. Tesla has not yet responded to a request for comment.

Tesla shares, which closed down 4.4%, fell another 2.5% in after-hours trading before recovering slightly.

Musk later apologized. But not for the mocking tweet. Instead he doubled down on this trollery and apologized for the typo.

elon musk twitter sec typo tweet

Not all of his supporters appreciated the tweets, calling the CEO out for hurting the stock. Muskadvice: &Hang in there. If you are truly long-term, it will be fine.&

Just days before, Musk settled a securities fraud complaint filed by the SEC that could have been disastrous for Tesla and its shareholders. Musk agreed,in a settlement reached on September 29, to step down as chairman of Tesla and pay a $20 million fine.

Despite the penalties, it has been largely viewed as a sweet deal that allowed Musk to keep his CEO position as well as a seat on the board. Musk didn&thave to admit or deny the SECallegations either.

Musk is supposed to resign from his role as chairman of the Tesla board within 45 days of the agreement. He cannot seek reelection or accept an appointment as chairman for three years. An independent chairman will be appointed, under the settlement agreement.

Tesla agreed to pay a separate $20 million penalty, according to the SEC. The SEC said the charge and fine against Tesla is forfailing to require disclosure controls and procedures relating to Musktweets.

The SEC alleged in its complaint that Musklied when he tweeted on August 7 that he had &funding secured& for a private takeover of the company at $420 per share. Federal securities regulators reportedlyserved Tesla with a subpoena just a week after the tweet. Charges were filed just six weeks later.

The charges were filed after Musk and Teslaboard abruptly walked away from an agreement with the SEC. The board not only pulled out of the agreement, it issued a bold statement of support for Musk after the charges were filed. The NYT reported that Musk had givenan ultimatum to the board and threatened to resign if the board pushed him to settle.

A settlement was eventually reached anyway, albeit with stiffer penalties than the original agreement.

Still, the agreement was treated as good news by Wall Street, which sent Tesla shares higher and erased previous losses caused by the SEC complaint.

The series of tweets on Thursday followed an order by a federal judge that asked the SEC and Tesla to submit a joint letter explaining why the court should approve the consent judgment.

U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan, who wrote that the district court must determine whether as consent judgment is &fair and reasonable,& gave the two parties until October 11 to submit the explanation.

Itnot clear if Musktweets are a reaction to the judgeorder.

Write comment (92 Comments)

When you send something to space, itgood to have redundancy. Sometimes you want to send two whole duplicate spacecraft just in case — as was the case with Voyager — but sometimes itgood enough to have two of critical components. Mars Rover Curiosity is no exception, and it is now in the process of switching from one main &brain& to the other so it can do digital surgery on the first.

Curiosity landed on Mars with two central computing systems, Side-A and Side-B (not left brain and right brain — that would invite too much silliness). They&re perfect duplicates of each other, or were — it was something of a bumpy ride, after all, and cosmic radiation may flip a bit here and there.

The team was thankful to have made these preparations when, on sol 200 in February of 2013 (we&re almost to sol 2,200 now), the Side-A computer experienced a glitch that ended up taking the whole rover offline. The solution was to swap over to Side-B, which was up and running shortly afterwards and sending diagnostic data for its twin.

Having run for several years with no issues, Side-B is now, however, having its own problems. Since September 15 it has been unable to record mission data, and it doesn&t appear to be a problem that the computer can solve itself. Fortunately, in the intervening period, Side-A has been fixed up to working condition — though it has a bit less memory than it used to, since some corrupted sectors had to be quarantined.

&We spent the last week checking out Side A and preparing it for the swap,& said Steven Lee, deputy project manager of the Curiosity program at JPL, in a mission status report. &We are operating on Side A starting today, but it could take us time to fully understand the root cause of the issue and devise workarounds for the memory on Side B. Itcertainly possible to run the mission on the Side-A computer if we really need to. But our plan is to switch back to Side B as soon as we can fix the problem to utilize its larger memory size.&

No timeline just yet for how that will happen, but the team is confident that they&ll have things back on track soon. The mission isn&t in jeopardy — but this is a good example of how a good system of redundancies can add years to the life of space hardware.

Write comment (92 Comments)

Five years ago, no startups from Latin America were participating in prestigious U.S. accelerators like 500 Startups or Y Combinator. In fact, no Latin American startup reached the renowned Silicon Valley accelerator, Y Combinator, until 2015, when ColombiaPlatzi was invited to join.

It seemed that Latin America was not yet on anyoneradar at the big global accelerators. At the time, 500 Startups in Silicon Valley was one of the only global accelerators that was paying attention to Latin America. 500 Startups& first Latin American startup investment was ChileWelcu in Batch 2 (2011), followed by BrazilContaAzul in Batch 3 (2012) and MexicoYogome and BrazilIngresse in Batch 4 (2012). Alongside fashion platform Femeninas, we were one of the first startups based in Argentina to be accepted into the program in 2012.

500 Startups has since focused on forging partnerships and investing in startups in Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Chile and Peru.

Nowadays, dozens of Latin American startups, principally from Colombia, are joining U.S. accelerators. Since 2016, Rappi, UBits, Ropeo, Hogaru and Tributi have entered Y Combinator from Colombia, while RunaHR, Grin, BrainHi and Fintual have brought Mexico, Puerto Rico and Chile into the YC network, as well. Over the past five years, global and local accelerator programs have taken hold across Latin America. Whatmore, we&re starting to see many specialized programs emerge and focus on accelerating companies in specific sectors, such as agtech, fintech and social impact. Herehow the role of the accelerator is evolving in Latin America.

The inflection point: Start-Up Chile and NXTP Labs

When Start-Up Chile launched in 2010, it became the darling of the Latin American tech ecosystem. In dozens of articles, Start-Up Chile is known as the &spark that ignited Latin Americastartup ecosystem,& and is often identified as the inspiration for government acceleration programs worldwide. Among programs in Latin America that arose from the Start-Up Chile &spark& are Startup Peru, Parallel 18, IncuBAte, Startup Mexico, Ruta N and 21212.

However, there are two other local accelerator programs that arose around the same period, without as much global publicity as Start-Up Chile. 500 Startups Mexico City and NXTP Labs launched their local acceleration programs in 2010 and 2011, respectively, focusing on Spanish-speaking Latin American startups at a time when Start-Up Chile was still only focused on accelerating foreign enterprises. Of the 16 startups that graduated from NXTP Labs& second group, 13 were from Latin America, 10 of which were specifically founded in Argentina.

Accelerators are now one of the top ways for Latin American startups to secure funding and reach international markets.

We went through NXTP Labs& accelerator program in 2014, after they had successfully graduated dozens of local companies. But even before they became one of the regiontop private accelerators, NXTP Labs was one of the most active early-stage investors in Latin America. To date, there are still very few fully private venture capital funds in Latin America, including NXTP Labs, Magma Partners and Kaszek Ventures.

Since they began, Start-Up Chile, NXTP Labs and 500 Startups Latam have accelerated more than 2,000 startups in total, generating millions of dollars in revenue and investment, and creating hundreds of jobs across Latin America and beyond.

More importantly, they created the impetus for a steady wave of startup accelerators to enter the Latin American ecosystem.

The newcomers: industry-specific accelerators

In the past few years, accelerators of all kinds have cropped up in Latin America to provide mentorship, support and investment for startups as they grow. However, the regional trend has been to shift away from general support (i.e. the Start-Up Chile model) toward more specialized, industry-specific acceleration. Even NXTP Labs has pivoted its accelerator programs, focusing almost exclusively on fintech and agtech startups in Latin America, as they believe these two fields provide a competitive advantage in the local markets.

The new tendency toward specialization has led to the rise of programs such as The Yield Lab, an Argentine agtech accelerator, Chilean Bci Labs, focused on fintech, and Startupbootcampnew fintech program in Mexico City.

According to GustLatin American accelerator report, more than half (58 percent) of startup accelerators in the region are focused on a specific vertical rather than trying to be a jack-of-all-trades.

Most of the government-funded accelerators, such as Startup Mexico, Parallel 18, Ruta N and Startup Peru, still support startups from every sector. MassChallenge Mexico also allows startups from any industry to apply for acceleration.

Whatnext: bringing women into entrepreneurship

While fintech, agtech, blockchain and other hot industries have gotten their share of the limelight, there is still a massive elephant in the room (or the co-working space) in Latin America: the lack of women. A random sampling of 50 startups selected for accelerator programs this year in Latin America revealed just 28 percent had female founders.

A recent blog found just four incubator and accelerator programs that are specifically targeted toward enabling female founders in Latin America: Empoderando Mujeres in Mexico, Capital Abeja and The S Factory in Chile, and WIN Lab, which is actually based in Miami.

This vertical is one that is missing from the conversation in Latin America, and the world. Women make up just 17 percentof startup founders and receive only 2 percent of VC dollars, but it is estimated that fully incorporating women into entrepreneurship could boost the global GDP by US$12 trillion.

A lot has changed in Latin America since we launched our company and entered our first accelerator in 2012. Dozens of global accelerators and companies looking to support and invest in Latin American companies are joining the local accelerators that paved the way, such as Start-Up Chile and NXTP Labs.

More than ever before, the prestigious accelerator programs, such as Y Combinator in Silicon Valley and other programs across Europe and the U.S., are accepting startups from Latin America. Local accelerators are refining their strategies and focusing primarily on niche industries, such as agtech and fintech, to tap into Latin Americacompetitive advantages. Accelerators are now one of the top ways for Latin American startups to secure funding and reach international markets. While there are still gaps to fill, itbeen rewarding to watch these programs develop and succeed in the region.

Write comment (91 Comments)

On the heels of Backstage Capital announcement to launch an accelerator for startups led by underrepresented founders, the venture capital firm has selected its fourth location. Backstage Capital decided on three of the cities ahead of time and held a public vote to determine the fourth. Well, the results are in and Backstage Capital has landed on Detroit, Mich. for the acceleratorfourth location.

&Ita rising standout for entrepreneurs in the Midwest,& the firm writes on its site. &Innovation and technology in the city are booming, and Detroit startups are attracting capital from Silicon Valley as well as local investors and government.&

Backstage Capital is also going to run accelerators in Los Angeles, Philadelphia and London.Through Backstage Capitalaccelerator, the firm will invest $100,000 in each company in exchange for five percent equity. Unlike other Silicon Valley accelerators, there won&t be a demo day because it &seems a little like standardized testing,& Backstage Capital Founder and Managing Partner Arlan Hamilton said at TechCrunch Disrupt San Francisco last month.The deadline to apply is October 15.

BackstageCapitalmission is to provide early seed funding to founders who are women, people of color and/or LGBTQ — groups that are vastly underrepresented in Silicon Valley. A few months ago, Backstage Capital launched a $36 million fund. Since receiving its first check from a limited partner in 2015, Backstage Capital has invested in 100 companies — writing checks anywhere between $25,000 and $100,000. You can read more about the accelerator below.

Backstage Capital to launch an accelerator in four cities to promote underrepresented founders

Write comment (91 Comments)

2018 has been a good year for ridiculous, gargantuan LEGO builds. Just weeks ago, there was that life-size, driveable LEGO Bugatti.

Now someone has gone and built a mega-sized recreation of Apple new Cupertino &spaceship& campus — otherwise known as Apple Park.

Coming in at roughly 85,000 pieces, the build took designer Spencer_R a little over two years to complete, with many of those hours spent poring over drone footage of the campus& construction. At 6.8 x 4.5 feet, itbigger than most kitchen tables. Spencer says it weighs around 78 pounds.

Beyond the massive circular building that serves as the buildprimary feature, tons and tons of tiny details accent the brick canvas: its got the glass-walled Steve Jobs Theater, the hundred-year-old Glendenning Barn that was disassembled and rebuilt on the property, the employee parking garages, the visitor center and even some tiny employee basketball/tennis courts for good measure.

Someone recreated Applenew campus with 85,000 LEGO bricks and itexcellent

Oh, and trees. Lots and lots and lots of trees; 1,646 trees in all, by Spencercount.

This is hardly Spencerfirst time recreating a mega building — hedone custom creations of everything from the Eiffel Tower to Rockefeller Center. With that said, he notes that Apple Park is &nearly as large as all of [his] other LEGO skyscraper builds combined.&

[gallery ids="1726783,1726757,1726762,1726766,1726763,1726760"]

For more build details, you can tap through Spencer_Rgallery/build notes here. Thank you to Fabrizio Costantini for letting us use these photos.

Write comment (100 Comments)

Tesla Autopilot is often touted as the most capable and advanced driver assistance system available on the market today. But in Consumer Reports& view that honor actually goes to CadillacSuper Cruise.

Theconsumer organization gave Super Cruise the top spot in its first-ever ranking of partially automated driving systems because it is the best at striking a balance between technical capabilities and ensuring drivers are paying attention and operating the vehicle safely.

Thatan important distinction that means CR is considering a lot more than simply the technical capabilities of any one system.

CR evaluated four systems: Super Cruise on the Cadillac CT6, Autopilot on Tesla Model S, X and 3 models, ProPilot Assist onInfiniti QX50 and Nissan Leaf, and Pilot Assist onVolvo XC40 and XC60 vehicles. The organization said it picked these systems because they&re considered the most capable and well-known in the industry.

Testers looked at the capability and performance of the tech, how easy the system is to use and how well it monitored and kept the driver engaged. Testers also looked at how the system responded if the driver ignored warnings.

Tesla Autopilot scored higher than any other system for capability and ease of use. But Cadillac did a better job of making it clear when itsafe to use, keeping drivers engaged and reacting when someone is unresponsive to the warnings.

A partially automated driving system — some use the term semi-autonomous — typically uses sensors such as cameras and radar, as well as mapping data combined with software to assist with some driving tasks in certain conditions. For instance, these systems might provide lane keeping and adaptive cruise control on highways.

The ProPilot Assist system used by Nissan and Infiniti fell to third place and Volvosystem brought up the rear with poor marks (compared to its competitors) in nearly every category.

The consumer organization is particularly wary of how these systems are marketed and believe that automakers can send &mixed messages& that suggest these systems have autonomous or self-driving capabilities.

CRtests appear to have already had an affect, in at least how these systems are marketed. CR said that Volvo changed the language used to describe Pilot Assist, which was listed on its website under autonomous driving. Volvo no longer connects Pilot Assist to autonomous driving.

Write comment (92 Comments)