Americareluctance to regulate crypto is costing the country on startups and potentially the future of technology.

Thatthe view of two major names in the crypto space, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse — whose company createdcryptocurrency XRP — and Michael Arrington, the founder of TechCrunch who runs a dedicated crypto fund, who shared their thoughts at TechCrunch Disrupt San Francisco today.

While therebeen no breakout blockchain company so far — excluding those that servicethe industry through crypto exchanges or mining — nearly every major tech company has a stance on blockchain, and is actively looking into how it can work with it. While big companies as diverse as Facebook, IBM and Google are looking hardat whatpossible, most startups — which also bring innovation —are being developed elsewhere in the world.

&We have a few good U.S. investments,& Arrington said of his $100 million Arrington XRP fund. &But 80-90 percent of our investments are in Asia, Europe and Israel right now because they are actually countries where thereenough regulatory certainty that entrepreneurs feel safe starting token or blockchain companies there.&

&Here [in the U.S.] they don&t. Thereso much regulatory uncertainty, add to that the tax burden and the visa burden of coming here and then our current federal governmentstance on immigration in general, they&re just saying ‘Fuck it& and they&re staying in Singapore or Israel or Europe instead of coming here and starting companies,& he added.

In more stronger terms, Arrington said the lack of clarity is &single-handedly fucking the next stage of technology development.&

&The SEC needs to get their act together,& he added. &If they had done that with the internet in 1994-1995, TechCrunch/none of us would be here, we&d all be living in Shanghai or somewhere else, wherever had managed to get their act together.&

Garlinghouse echoed those statements, whilst adding that there is certainly a need for intervention from a regulator.

&There are unequivocally bad actors in the ICO ecosystem,& he said.&There have been frauds and massive scams — hundreds of millions of dollars, if not billions, have been heisted — if anything I&m surprised the SEC hasn&t been more aggressive.

&The clarity [around regulation] would be very helpful, therea risk that a lot of this developments ends up not being in the U.S.,& Garlinghouse explained. &The impact on the United States economy for having the internet that we think of today being very U.S.-centric in many ways has been very, very positive for the United States.&

The US is losing out to the rest of the world on blockchain, warn crypto figures

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said heconfident that XRP isn&t a security

While therebeen plenty of speculation around what tokens that the SEC might deem to be securities, Garlinghouse said that he isn&t concerned about a clampdown on XRP.

&We joked at an all-hands meeting recently — and some people didn&t find it funny — that if Ripple shutdown tomorrow, the XRP ledger would continue to operate. So if XRP is a security, it is a security of what& he said.

&The facts are pretty clear: XRP is not a security… I don&t spend a lot of time worrying about that.&

Crypto market crashes after Goldman reportedly scraps trading plans

Note: The author owns a small amount of cryptocurrency. Enough to gain an understanding, not enough to change a life.

Write comment (97 Comments)

Challenger bank N26 is launching a premium plan for professional accounts. N26 already had a free plan for freelancers and the self-employed, called N26 Business. N26 Business Black introduces the same perks as N26 Black, but for freelancers and the self-employed.

The new plan costs the same for regular users and business users. The company recently raised the price of N26 Black, so you&ll now have to pay €9.99 per month for N26 Black or N26 Business Black.

In addition to regular N26 features, N26 Business Black lets you withdraw money anywhere in the world without any conversion fee. You also get the Allianz insurance package, which includes travel insurance, mobile phone and ATM theft protection and an extended warranty on things you buy.

In order to sweeten the deal, N26 is offering three months of Zervant for customers based in Austria, Germany and France, and three months of Debitoor for everyone. Those are invoicing and accounting platforms for freelancers and small companies.

Write comment (100 Comments)

Never has it been so clear that the attorneys charged with enforcing the laws of the country have a complete disregard for the very laws they&re meant to enforce.

As executives of Twitter and Facebook took to the floor of the Senate to testify about their companies& response to international meddling into U.S. elections and addressed the problem of propagandists and polemicists using their platforms to spread misinformation, the legal geniuses at the Justice Department were focused on a free speech debate that isn&t just unprecedented, but also potentially illegal.

Justice Dept. says social media giants may be ‘intentionally stifling& free speech

These attorneys general convened to confabulate on the &growing concern& that social media companies are stifling expression and hurting competition. Whatreally at issue is a conservative canard and talking point that tries to make a case that private companies have a First Amendment obligation to allow any kind of speech on their platforms.

The simple fact is that they do not. Let me repeat that. They simply do not.

What the governmentlawyers are trying to do is foist a responsibility that they have to uphold the First Amendment onto private companies that are under no such obligation. Why are these legal eagles so up in arms The simple answer is the decision made by many platforms to silence voices that violate the expressed policies of the platforms they&re using.

Chief among these is Alex Jones — who has claimed that the Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax and accused victims of the Parkland school shooting of being crisis actors.

Last month a number of those social media platforms that distributed Jonesfinally decided that enough was enough.

Here are the platforms that have banned Infowars so far

The decision to boot Jones is their prerogative as private companies. While Jones has the right to shout whatever he wants from a soapbox in free speech alley (or a back alley, or into a tin can) — and while he can&t be prosecuted for anything that he says (no matter how offensive, absurd or insane) — he doesn&t have the right to have his opinions automatically amplified by every social media platform.

Almost all of the big networking platforms have come to that conclusion.

The technology-lobbying body has already issued a statement excoriating the Department of Justice for its ham-handed approach.

[The] U.S. Department ofJustice(DOJ) today released a statement saying that it was convening state attorneys general to discuss its concerns that these companies were &hurting competition and intentionally stifling the free exchange of ideas.& Social media platforms have the right to determine what types of legal speech they will permit on their platforms. It is inappropriate for the federal government to use the threat of law enforcement to limit companies from exercising this right. In particular, law enforcement should not threaten social media companies with unwarranted investigations for their efforts to rid their platforms of extremists who incite hate and violence.

While the Justice Departmentapproach muddies the waters and makes it more difficult for legitimate criticism and reasoned regulation of the social media platforms to take hold, there are legitimate issues that legislators need to address.

Indeed, many of them were raised in a white paper from Senator Mark Warner, which was released in the dog days of summer.

Or the Justice Department could focus on the issue that Senator Ron Wyden emphasized in the hours after the hearing:

Instead of focusing on privacy or security, attorneys general for the government are waging a Pyrrhic war against censorship that doesn&t exist and ignoring the real cold war for platform security.

Write comment (92 Comments)

America may have created AI, but China is taking the ball and running when it comes to one of the worldmost pivotal technology innovations.

Thataccording to Kai-Fu Lee, a world-renowned AI expert who founded Sinovation, a China-U.S. fund that raised its fourth fund worth $1 billion earlier this year.

Speaking at TechCrunch Disrupt San Francisco, Lee — who led Google in China before it left the country — said any lead Americatech industry may have enjoyed is rapidly being eroded by hungry Chinese entrepreneurs who have oodles more data at their disposal to build, train and deploy AI systems.

&People assume that because the U.S. is so strong in AI research, that theU.S. should dominate,& Lee said. &But actually, China is catching up really fast.&

Sinovation already has five AI companies in its portfolio that are valued at over $1 billion — that might be a record for any VC firm worldwide — and he explained China&magical ascent& in AI has taken just two years.

&Coming from way behind, now [China] is actually ahead of the U.S. in AI implementation,& Lee said. &AI we should think of it as electricity. Thomas Edison [the inventor of electricity] — and also the AI deep learning inventors who were American — they invented this stuff and then they generously shared it.

&Now, China, as the largestmarketplace with the largest amount of data, is really using AI to find every way to add value to traditional businesses, to internet, to all kinds of spaces. The Chinese entrepreneurial ecosystem is huge so today the most valuable AI companies in computer vision, speech recognition, drones are all Chinese companies,& Lee added.

But it isn&t just progress in the eyes of investors — who create valuations through their investment — Lee said thatChinese AI firms generate more sales, too, while Chinaaccounts fornearly halfof all VC investments and43 percent of allAI startups.

&These are companies that were founded between two and four years ago,& Lee explained.&This is really how fast itbeen, you have to be there to see the excitement and the pace.&

In the case of Sinovation, their billion-dollar AI companies include crypto firm Bitmain, image recognition company Megvii (known as Face++), fintech-focused4th Paradigm, autonomous driving AI company Momenta and chip outfitHorizon Robotics.

Much of the reporting around how China is using artificial intelligence centers around ways that the government is using facial recognition for surveillancepurposes. While that has included crime fighting, with facial recognition successfully used to identify and capture suspects, there are also concerns around more sinister applications, such as the surveillance of Chinese minorityUighur Muslims. China is reported to have detained as many as one millionUighurin camps, and facial recognition technology is believed to be one key part of surveillance strategy.

Lee, however, brushed off concern around the darker applications of AI in China, pointing out that the technology has the capacity to be abused anywhere in the world. He said China is also using the technology to develop new kinds of retail, manage busy urban traffic, build new kinds of educational services and more.

China is beating the US on AI, says noted investor Kai-Fu Lee

Indeed, Sinovation takes an unusual route to develop technologies and startups. As well as investing, it also develops technology in-house using a team of 200 people in its &institute.& Not only does that team work with portfolio companies and on a consultancy basis, but it develops its own services where it sees gaps in the market.

Indeed, the firm recently spun out its first venture from that tech team, which helps traditional retailers develop online-to-offline capabilities, which essentially marry the benefits of online commerce with more traditional brick and mortar retail. Thata strategy in which Chinese e-commerce giants Alibaba and JD.com have invested heavily.

Write comment (98 Comments)

McCarthyFinch sounds a bit like a law firm — and with good reason. The startup has developed an AI as a Service platform aimed at the legal profession. This week, itcompeting in the 2018 TechCrunch Disrupt Battlefield in San Francisco.

The company began life as a project at a leading New Zealand law firm, MinterEllisonRuddWatts. They wanted to look at how they could take advantage of AI to automate legal processes to make them more efficient, cost-effective and faster, according to company president Richard DeFrancisco.

&They were working on leveraging technology to become the law firm of the future, and they realized there were some pretty tremendous gaps,& he explained. They found a bunch of Ph.Ds working on artificial intelligence who worked with more than 30 lawyers over time to address those gaps by leveraging AI technology.

That internal project was spun out as a startup last year, emerging as an AI platform with 18 services. MinterEllison, along with New Zealand VC Goat Ventures, gave the fledgling company US$2.5 million in pre-seed money to get started.

The company looked at automating a lot of labor-intensive tasks related to legal document review and discovery such as document tagging. &Lawyers spend a lot of time tagging things with regards to whatrelevant and not relevant, and itnot a good use of their time. We can go through millions of documents very quickly,& DeFrancisco said. He claims they can lower the time it takes to tag a set of documents in a lawsuit from weeks to minutes.

[gallery ids="1705643,1705649,1705647,1705648,1700421,1700422,1700423,1700424,1700425,1700426,1700427,1700428,1700429"]

He says that one of their key differentiators is their use of natural language processing (NLP), which he says allows the company to understand language and nuance to interpret documents with a high level of accuracy, even when there are small data sets. Instead of requiring thousands of documents to train their models, which he says law firms don&t have time to do, they can begin to understand the gist of a case in as little as two or three documents with 90 percent accuracy, based on their tests.

They don&t actually want to sell their platform directly to law firms. Instead, they hope to market their artificial intelligence skills as a service to other software vendors with a legal bent who are looking to get smarter without building their own AI from scratch.

&What we are doing is going to technology service providers and talking to them about using our solution. We have restful APIs to integrate into their technology and do a Powered By-model,& DeFrancisco explained.

The startup currently has 10 trials going on. While he couldn&t name them, he did say that they include the largest law firm in Europe, largest global provider of legal information and the fastest growing SaaS company in history. They are also working on agreements with large systems integrators including Deloitte and Accenture to act as resellers of their solution.

While they are based in New Zealand, they plan to open a U.S. office in the Los Angeles area shortly after Disrupt. The engineering team will remain in New Zealand, and DeFrancisco will build the rest of the company in the U.S as it seeks to expand its reach. They also plan to start raising their next round of funding.

Write comment (92 Comments)

People like to say that brick-and-mortar retail is dead, but direct-to-consumer businesses continue to dabble with physical stores all the same.

Why Because brick-and-mortar retail provides businesses with benefits an online shopping platform can&t, namelyconsumer experiences that create and sustain shoppers& relationships with brands.

To help the next generation of digitally native stores expand into the physical world, Uppercase, formerly known as thisopenspace, is launching out of stealth with $3.5 million in venture capital funding.Lerer Hippeau has led the round, with participation from CRV and SV Angels.

Uppercase works with real estate agents, architects and designers to build stores for online brandsin New York City, Los Angeles and Toronto.

Co-founder and CEO Yashar Nejati started the company after noticing that online brands were experimenting with pop-up shops then establishing permanent storefronts.

Menretailer Frank - Oak, which picked up a $16 million Series C this year, is a great example of that trend. The company began as an internet retailer and now has several stores throughout Canada. Luggage startup Away, trendy shoe company Allbirds and Emily Weiss& makeup company Glossier have done the same.

&Anyone can launch an online brand,& Nejati told TechCrunch. &Brands truly stand out from the crowd once they grow beyond digital — we&re seeing this with Warby Parker, Casper and Indochino, who will have over 350 stores by the end of 2018. Uppercase is part of a modern growth strategy, providing tech-enabled flexible retail stores for brands to launch, analyze and grow their retail presence.&

So far, Uppercase has built stores for furniture company Joybird and Venus et Fleur, which sells artfully arranged roses.

Early-stage investor Lerer Hippeau has backed a number of direct-to-consumer brands, including the aforementionedAllbirds and Casper.

&We&ve seen the importance of an omnichannel strategy as companies scale,& Lerer Hippeau Graham Brown told TechCrunch. &Uppercase is the perfect partner for brands born online looking to expand into the physical world.&

Write comment (96 Comments)