Technology

Build versus buy Potential partner or potential disruptor

The option set for corporations to collaborate with startups used to be simpler. Today, the options seem almost endless: build, partner, buy, integrate with their APIs, co-develop product together, white-label a part of their technology, share specific data sets, cross-sell each otherproducts — and more.The notion of a straightforward &vendor& relationship doesn&t apply anymore.

The landscape has also changed. If the corporate posture of the past around innovation could be described as ¬ invented here& with a strong bias toward building internally, todaycorporate posture leans in a much different direction, with many thinking about how to disrupt themselves before an external party beats them to it.

Not surprisingly, this has created more corporate and startup partnerships. While getting this type of collaboration right is beneficial for both parties, if you speak to most startups selling into large enterprises or corporate executives looking to partner with startups today, you will find many justifiable frustrations on both sides.

As the vice president of Business Development at RRE Ventures, an early-stage venture capital firm based in New York, a major part of my role is leading our business development initiatives, where we enable collaboration between corporations and startups. Before this role, I spent time on the corporate side and on the startup side, so I&ve gotten to see this dynamic from both angles throughout my career. While there is no silver bullet for this type of work, here are a few best practices I&ve learned, sometimes through painful mistakes, or observed along the way.

For startups looking to sell into large enterprises

Do your homework. Corporate executives expect you to be prepared. Spend the time to understand what their business might be going through. Do they need new growth opportunities Do they need to cut costs Given the size of these companies, iteasy to find information on them.

Spend time reading recent press, analyst reports on the company or understanding more about the division you are speaking to. You want to walk in saying some version of &Here is how I think my product can be relevant to you and help you with one of your key objectives& instead of saying some version of &Here is my shiny object — don&t you want to buy it&

Be realistic about where you are and where you are headed.The last thing you want to happen is for a corporation to agree to use or test your product only for you to tell them in the next sentence that you haven&t yet launched or built what you just showed them. Be realistic with the corporation about what you can do for them today, tomorrow and in the future. They will be more flexible than you might think if they understand your timelines and product road map.

Focus on ease of use and ease of integration.We might all be reading headlines about Mars exploration these days, but letground ourselves in a different space reality. Itnot uncommon for major Fortune 500 companies today to still be operating tech or leveraging data models that were built before man was put on the moon. Your technology might be incredible, but if they can&t test it easily or seamlessly integrate it with their tech stack, you are unlikely to get real traction.

Understand the complexities of operating at scale.Think of your own trajectory as a company and how hard it has been to scale your company, from gettingthe right people to growing revenue and building the right product — and every detail in-between. Now multiply that by a million. Even though Fortune 500 corporations have more resources in absolute magnitude, they have all the same problems you do, often with more complexities, given their scale.

If integrating your product has negative consequences for them, it will likely affect millions of customers, billions of dollars of revenue and have major brand and shareholder consequences, so have some empathy on why they want to properly vet your product and company first.

Learn to fly at 30,000 feet or 30 feet.Effective startup leadership requires one to zoom in and out on a daily basis, quickly and seamlessly. The ability to quickly shift gears and move between big picture and small details is crucial for operating early-stage companies. Italso essential for working with corporations. Depending on the meeting, a prospective client might want you to go into the technical weeds or have a strategy discussion on a use case thatnot on your road map.

Be ready to fly at both levels, and also be deliberate about where you personally spend your time, as ityour scarcest asset while running a resource-constrained startup.

For corporations looking to integrate new technologies

Optimize for quality, not quantity, and focus on real use cases. While it can be tempting to meet with every startup employing the right buzzword of the moment (artificial intelligence, blockchain, machine learning), you want to avoid going on a startup safari where you see a number of cool things in the wild and walk away without doing anything differently in your organization.

Instead of meeting with technology companies based on buzzwords, identify real problems your organization needs to solve and find companies that can help you solve those problems. What matters in the end is translating technology to real tangible use cases that are digestible internally in your organization.

Make fast decisions.As a corporate executive I know puts it, &Maybes kill startups. A fast No is the best thing after Yes.& If you know you are not going to leverage the companyproduct, say no as quickly as possible. With fewer resources, startups don&t have the same meeting after meeting bandwidth as you. Remember, saying no now isn&t no forever.

Should you find yourself in a different situation a few months from now, you can always go back and revisit the company. In either case, please give startups real feedback, especially when you don&t move forward with them. In many cases these companies are early on in their growth trajectory, and providing honest feedback helps them build their own product and business.

Create better internal processes to partner with smaller companies. Unless you are one of the few corporations that have set this up well, most of your internal processes (IT Review, Procurement and Sourcing, Compliance, Security, Risk Analysis and Legal Review) for commercial vendor relationships are not set up with smaller companies in mind, which have limited HR and legal teams. To innovate more quickly, create a different set of processes for these types of partnerships that allow you to still assess risk but in a faster, more streamlined way. If your ability to partner is slower than the pace of change, you will never be ahead of the curve.

Short-term versus long-term change. Think about innovation along different time horizons.A good place to start is McKinseythree horizons of growth methodology. Consider how you will collaborate with companies along these different time horizons. The most senior level in your organization should take this view as this conflicts with focusing on real use cases today. Make sure that your company is not just integrating incremental changes at all levels.

Build a better sandbox.Find ways to test new technologies with your own existing systems and data in a way that replicates scale without affecting your existing business.You don&t want to spend months creating a partnership only to find out the technology isn&t what you expected. The more this sandbox can mimic your true environment, the more likely you are to have success with the real integration.

We think a lot about corporate and startup collaboration and welcome any dialogue on the topic; contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Amazon acquired social reading service Goodreads five years ago, squelching the life out of the competitive landscape, asminimal as it was. So itpromising to see a new app appear with the goal of getting more people to move off of Goodreads for social book recommendations. That app is Inky, built by two bookworm friends who wanted a better way to track their reading and find recommendations of what to read next.

The app is very much an indie effort for the time being, and not as polished as a similar app,Reco. However, it works well for those who are looking for a simple way of tracking their &read& list along with their &to read& list, and who want a way to see what other good books people are into right now.

Explains co-founderSimon Bruno, &Mobile apps for avid readers just suck. The market leader in social networks for avid readers, Goodreads, is practically synonymous with archaic,& he says.

After asking around about what people actually want in an app for readers, he recruited his friendMike Salvador to help build it. Both just graduated from college, and have decided to work on Inky full-time.

&No one knows who we are,& Bruno says. &We&re definitely not funded.&

But, he adds, they&re updating the app every few days and getting &little sleep in the process.&

Currently, you can sign up for Inky using Facebook or email, and then you&re presented with some pre-selected users to follow. You can check or uncheck these suggestions as you choose. There aren&t many users on the app at present, beyond around 1,000 early adopters and some Instagram book nerds, the co-founder notes. So you may want to at least seed your network with a few of them.

You can then fill out your two bookshelves — &read& and &to read& — with books, by searching for titles. Once added, these are presented in a visual format, similar to how Slice Bookshelf looked back in the day before its untimely demise. You also can tap on books& covers to read a description, giving you the feeling of picking up a book at the store and reading its jacket.

Unfortunately, the app only presents the new recommendations from those you follow and not their recommendation history in its home feed; but you can visit users& profiles to check their lists until friends post something new.

The founders say their goal right now is to take in user feedback, then build what they hear people want. They aren&t looking to make money off Inky just yet.

&The goal is to partner with publishing houses to help launch new titles, similar to Goodreads& business model,& says Bruno. &Once we&re confident we have something people absolutely love, we&ll turn our heads towards monetization,& he says.

However, their vision is not to reproduce Goodreads in a more modern format. That is, Inky is not meant to be a catalog of all the books you&ve ever read, but rather a place for you to show off the books you think should be read. For that reason, the team won&t offer a Goodreads import mechanism. Instead, its focus will be on recommendations.

That may make sense to a point, but there are times you want to read a book and then are unpleasantly disappointed by it. Your negative reaction is just as valuable to your network of book readers as are your recommendations.

As an occasional Goodreads user myself, I can&t see making a full switch to Inky. I miss the &Currently Reading& shelf, the book lists, the discovery features and, of course, the much larger community. But Inky is one to watch as it grows.

Inky is currently available on iOS, but the team says an Android version is the works.

Apple has placed a series order for Foundation, an adaptation of Isaac Asimovclassic series of science fiction stories and novels.

Deadline reported earlier this year that the show was in development, but this was just the latest of several attempts to adapt Foundation, including a version developed by WestworldJonathan Nolan for HBO.

Now, however, it looks like Foundation really will happen at Apple, with David S. Goyer and Josh Friedman as showrunners. (Like Nolan, Goyer was one of the writers on The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises, while Friedman created Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles.) The series will be produced by Skydance Television, and Asimovdaughter Robyn will be one of the executive producers.

The Foundation series (initially a set of stories published in the 1940s, then collected into book form in the &50s and followed up by long novels that Asimov wrote in the &80s) focuses on the fall of a long-lived Galactic Empire, with a small group of scientists at the edge of the galaxy working to preserve knowledge and minimize the period of chaos.

Elements of that plot description might make it sound like the ingredients for Appleversion of Star Wars— and indeed, Asimovwork is seen as a big influence on George Lucas& films.

But in its print form, at least, Foundation is far from your typical space opera, focusing more on debate and political intrigue than action, and taking place over hundreds of years, with often interchangeable characters swapped out between stories. In other words, Goyer and Friedman will probably have to make some significant changes.

These are my favorite books by my favorite author, so I&m more excited about this than any of the other original shows that Appleplanning (even the companyother space opera, which is being developed by Battlestar GalacticaRon Moore). I sure hope they don&t screw it up.