Music
Trailers
DailyVideos
India
Pakistan
Afghanistan
Bangladesh
Srilanka
Nepal
Thailand
StockMarket
Business
Technology
Startup
Trending Videos
Coupons
Football
Search
Download App in Playstore
Download App
Best Collections
Technology
Star Wars: The Clone Wars, an animated series that ran on Cartoon Network for five seasons, is coming back.
Created by George Lucas and overseen by Dave Filoni, the show depicted the adventures of Anakin Skywalker, Obi-Wan Kenobi, as well as new characters like Ahsoka Tano, during the titular Clone Wars. Fans praised its ability to showcase a wide range of stories, characters and even genres.
The Clone Wars was cancelled after Disneyacquisition of Lucasfilm, with a final batch of episodes known as &The Lost Missions& airing on Netflix. Characters and story elements were subsequently incorporated into the animated series Star Wars Rebels— and even into the latest film, Solo.
Today at San Diego Comic-Con, Lucasfilm held a panel celebrating the show10-year anniversary, where Filoni announced that The Clone Wars will return for 12 more episodes, which will air on Disneyupcoming streaming service. He also released the first trailer for the new season.
It sounds like these episodes are being pitched as the end of the Clone Wars story, with Filoni telling StarWars.com, &Any opportunity to put the final pieces of the story in place is meaningful as a storyteller.&
Itnot clear what this means for The Clone Wars& presence on Netflix. Meanwhile, Disney says it will launch its still-unnamed streaming service next year with exclusive Star Wars and Marvel shows — it already announced a live action Star Wars series written and produced by Jon Favreau.
- Details
- Category: Technology
Read more: Disney’s streaming service is resurrecting ‘The Clone Wars’
Write comment (90 Comments)TheTechCrunch Summer Party at August Capitalis the stuff of Silicon Valley legend. We&re celebrating 13 years of libations and convivial conversation while toasting the entrepreneurial spirit on the deck at August Capital in Menlo Park on July 27. And we want you to join us.
If you have not yet secured your ticket to this summer soiree, heed our call. We&ve just released the last round of tickets. Once they go — and go quickly they will — thatit. No party for you. Get clicking and buy your ticket right here, right now.
We aren&t kidding when we say legendary things happen at TechCrunch events. Our favorite story is when Box founders Aaron Levie and Dylan Smith met one of their first investors, DFJ, at our summer party hosted by TechCrunch founder, Michael Arrington in his Atherton backyard.
And thatjust it — this party draws a veritable whowho of the startup community. You never know who you&ll meet on the deck at August Capital. Opportunity awaits, along with some pretty spiffy door prizes like TechCrunch swag, Amazon Echos and tickets toDisrupt San Francisco 2018.
Herethe where, when and how much:
- July 27, 5:30 p.m. & 9:00 p.m.
- August Capital in Menlo Park
- Ticket price: $95
All those influential party people make the TechCrunch Summer Party at August Capital a great place for founders to showcase their early-stage startups, so consider buying a party demo table at the event. The price includes four party tickets — thata sweet deal.
This is it, folks. The last round of tickets to the TechCrunch Summer Party at August Capital. They&re available now, first-come, first-served, so buy yours today. It won&t be a party without you!
- Details
- Category: Technology
Read more: Last call for tickets to the TechCrunch Summer Party at August Capital
Write comment (99 Comments)We are moving toward a society controlled by algorithms, but very few of us actually understand how they work. This asymmetry of information is a recipe for disaster. Case in point: Recently in the U.K., analgorithmic failureput the lives of 450,000 woman at risk through a technical error that inhibited their ability to detect breast cancer.
Unfortunately, this is not an anomaly, and if the tech industry doesn&t take the lead on imposing oversights to our algorithms, the government may create its own regulations — causing roadblocks to innovation.
We have seen time and time again the mistake of placing our blind trust in algorithms. Even our best intentions can go awry when we&re working with something we don&t always understand, which has the ability to scale globally almost instantly.
This isn&t a new concept. For example, since the early 1900s, &scientifically proven& was the trend in innovation, which bled into marketing — only a few people with highly specialized knowledge, in this case scientists, had the esoteric research along with understanding of DNA and biological sciences. Most people blindly believed this research, and it was exploited to sell products. By the early 1990s, &data driven& beat out &scientifically proven& and became the de rigueur buzz phrase — anything data driven (or data-related) must be correct because the data said so, and therefore one should trust us and buy referenced products.
Now that has been superseded by terms like &AI& and &machine learning& — still part of this knowledge only understood by a few that is being used to sell products.
For years, these terms and approaches have been guiding myriad choices in our lives, yet the vast majority of us have just had to accept these decisions at face value because we don&t understand the science behind them.
In an age in which many aspects of technology could still be considered the &Wild West,& and tech gurus &outlaws,& I contend, as a whole, that this is a problem we should get in front of rather than behind. It is imperative that companies should voluntarily prescribe to Algorithmic Audits — an unbiased third-party verification. Much like a B-Corp certification for companies, these external audits would show that onecompany is doing the right thing and course-correct any biases.
If we don&t take a firm lead on this type of verification process, the government may eventually step in and impose overly cumbersome regulations. The oversight required to do so would be nearly impossible and would eventually impede progress on any number of initiatives.
Technology adapts faster than even the technology industry can handle, and so adding a layer of governmental bureaucracy would further throttle innovation. Data science is like every other science, requiring experimentation and beta testing to arrive at more effective technologies; regulation would stifle this process.
We&ve seen similar occurrences before; for example, before insurance companies can work their data into their actuarial models they need to be certified by the State.There is a growing movement in cities and at companies to address bias in algorithms. Recently,New York City assembled an algorithm task force to look at whether its automated decision system israciallybiased. According to aState Scooparticle,&The City uses algorithms for numerous functions, including predicting where crimes will occur, scheduling building inspections, and placing students in public schools. But algorithmic decision-making has been deeplyscrutinized in recent years as itbecome more commonplace in local government, especially with respect to policing.&
The tech industry funding a research council, with the goal of creating best practices to elevate the quality of algorithms,is far better than the alternative.According to Fast Company, algorithms now even have their own certification, &a seal of approval that designates them as accurate, unbiased, and fair.& The seal was developed byCathy O&Neil, a statistician and author who launched her own company to ensure algorithms aren&t unintentionally harming people.
In the effort to practice what I preach, we did exactly this at my firm, Rentlogic, a company designed to give apartment buildings grades based on a combination of public data and physical building inspections. Because our ratings are based on an algorithm that uses public data, we wanted to ensure it was unbiased. We hired aforementionedWeapons of Math Destructionauthor, Cathy O&Neil, who spent five months going through our code to prove it faithfully represented what we say it did. This is paramount for creating trust from the public and private sectors as well as our investors;people now care more than everabout impacting in companies creating a positive impact.
With more and more stakeholders turning their attention to algorithms, I hope we will see more firms independently doing the same. In order for the tech industry to maintain integrity and faith in algorithms — and the publictrust — we must take it upon ourselves to seek third-party audits voluntarily. The alternative will be disastrous.
- Details
- Category: Technology
Read more: Why self-regulation is better than legislative regulation
Write comment (90 Comments)FlixBus, the low-cost bus service out of Europe, is doubling down on its U.S. launch. The parent company, FlixMobility, started cheap bus routes between Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Phoenix and Tucson just two months ago.
Now itadding another 16 connections throughout central and northern California. as well as Nevada and Arizona. The new connections, which begin Thursday, include California cities such asBakersfield, Commerce, Fremont, Fresno, Gilroy, Kettleman City, Millbrae, Oakland, Richmond, Sacramento, Salinas, San Francisco, San JoseandUniversal City. Tempe, Ariz. and Reno, Nev. have also been added. Several of these routes, including from Los Angeles to San Francisco, Bakersfield to Fresno and Oakland to Burbank are $9.99.
FlixBus might be competing with traditional bus company Greyhound with fares between U.S. cities as low as $4.99. But it has a different business model that is more comparable to ride-hailing company Uber. FlixBus, which now operates in 28 countries, manages the ticketing, customer service, network planning, marketing and sale of its product. The driving is left to local partners, which get to keep a percentage of the ticket receipts.
These local bus partners manage the daily operations of the brightly painted FlixBuses. The company says itadding 26 more buses to its fleet to accommodate the expansion.New bus partners include Alvand Transportation, Amador Stage Lines, Classic Charter, LD Tours, Transportation Charter Services and Tourcoach.
FlixBus vehicles have other touches beyond its brightly painted facades aimed at attracting customers. The buses offer free Wi-Fi and onboard entertainment, and customers can use an app to book their tickets and track their bus.
Customers can also choose tooffset their carbon emissions with &CO2 Neutral& tickets. An additional 1 to 3 percent of the original price of these CO2 Neutral tickets are donated to a certified Global Climate Protection Project as well as the National Forest Foundation.
&We chose California as our new home because, more than anywhere else in the US, people no longer want the hassle of driving,& Pierre Gourdain, the managing director of FlixBus USA, said in a statement, who added the company has become southern Californiahometown carrier in a matter of weeks.
The company, which is backed by private equity investors such as Silver Lake Partners and General Atlantic, launched as FlixBus in 2013 following the deregulation of the German bus market. It has since evolved beyond the name change to FlixMobility. Today, the company operates the FlixBus and FlixTrain brands and as a pilot project forall-electric buses in Germany and France.
- Details
- Category: Technology
Read more: Euro startup FlixBus expands its $10 bus service in California
Write comment (100 Comments)In a blog post today, Instagram announced a new feature: a green status dot that indicates when a user is active on the app. If you&re cruising around Instagram, you can expect to see a green dot next to the profile pics of friends who also are Instagramming right then and there.
The dot will show up in the direct messaging part of the app but also on your friendlist when you go to share a post with someone. Instagram clarifies that &You will only see status for friends who follow you or people who you have talked to in Direct,& so itmeant to get you talking more to the people you&re already talking to.You can disable the status info in the &Activity Status& bit of the appSettings menu, where itset to &on& by default.
Prior to the advent of the green dot, Instagram already displayed how long ago someone was active by including information like &Active 23m ago& or &Active Now& in grey text next to their account info where your direct messages live. For those of us who prefer a calm, less real-time experience, the fact that features like these come on by default is a bummer.
Given the grey activity status text, the status dot may not seem like that much of a change. Still, itone opt-out design choice closer to making Instagram a compulsive real-time social media nightmare like Facebook or Facebook Messenger. The quiet, incremental rollout of features like the grey status text is often so subtle that users don&t notice it — as a daily Instagram user, I barely did.
Making major shifts very gradually is the same game Facebook always plays with its products, layering slight design changes that alter user behavior until one day you wake up and aren&t using the same app you used to love, but somehow you can&t seem to stop using it. Instagram is working on a feature for in-app time management, but stuff like this negates Facebookbroader supposed efforts to make our relationship with its attention-hungry platforms less of a compulsive tic.
Itnot like users will be relieved that they can now see who is &online& in the app. The last time Instagram users passionately requested a feature it was to demand a return to the chronological feed, and we all know how that went.Over the years, Instagram users have mostly begged that the appparent company not mess it up, and yet here we are. The Facebookification of Instagram marches on.
Ita shame to see that happening with Instagram, which used to feel like one of the only peaceful places online, a serene space where you weren&t thrown into fits of real-time FOMO because usually your friends were #latergramming static images from good times previously had, not broadcasting the fun stuff you&re missing out on right now. Ithard to see how features like this square with Facebookostensible mission to move away from its relentless pursuit of engagement in favor of deepening the quality of user experiences with a mantra of &time well spent.& As users start to resent the steep attentional toll that makes Facebook &free,& ita shame to see Instagram follow Facebook down the same dark path.
- Details
- Category: Technology
Read more: Instagram adds a status indicator dot so people know when you’re ignoring them
Write comment (93 Comments)Microsoft is capping off a rather impressive year without any major missteps in its final report for its performance in its 2018 fiscal year, posting a quarter that seems to have been largely non-offensive to Wall Street.
In the past year, Microsoftstock has gone up more than 40 percent. In the past two years, itnearly doubled. All of this came after something around a decade of that price not really doing anything as Microsoft initially missed major trends like the shift to mobile and the cloud. But since then, new CEO Satya Nadella has turned that around and increased the companyfocused on both, and Azure is now one of the companybiggest highlights. Microsoft is now an $800 billion company, which, while still considerably behind Apple, Amazon and Google, is a considerable high considering the past decade.
In addition, Microsoft passed $100 billion in revenue for a fiscal year. So, as you might expect, the stock didn&t really do anything, given that nothing seemed to be too wrong with what was going on. For a company thatat around $800 billion, that itnot doing anything bad at this point is likely a good thing. That Microsoft is even in the discussion of being one of the companies chasing a $1 trillion market cap is likely something we wouldn&t have been talking about just three or four years ago.
The company said it generated $30.1 billion in revenue, up 17 percent year-over-year, and adjusted earnings of $1.13 per share. Analysts were looking for earnings of $1.08 per share on revenue of$29.23 billion.
So, under Nadella, this is more or less a tale of two Microsofts — one squarely pointed at a future of productivity software with an affinity toward cloud and mobile tools (though Windows is obviously still a part of this), and one that was centered around the home PC. Here are a couple of highlights from the report:
- LinkedIn:Microsoft said revenue for LinkedIn increased37 percent, with LinkedInsessions growth of 41 percent. Microsoftprofessional network was also listed in a bucket of other segments that it attributed to increased operating expenditures, which also includedcloud engineering, and commercial sales capacity. It was also bucketed into a 12 percent increase in research and development with cloud engineering, as well as a bump in sales and marketing expenses. This all seems pretty normal for a network Microsoft hopes to continue to grow.
- Azure: Microsoftcloud platform continued to drive its server products and cloud services revenue, which increased 26 percent. The company said Azurerevenue was up 89 percent &due to growth from consumed and SaaS revenue.& Once again, Microsoft didn&t break out specifics on its Azure products, though it seems pretty clear that this is one of their primary growth drivers.
- Office 365:Office 365 saw commercial revenue growth of 38 percent, and consumer subscribers increased to 31.4 million. Alongside LinkedIn, Microsoft seems to be assembling a substantial number of subscription SaaS products that offset a shift in its model away from personal computing and into a more cloud-oriented company.
- GitHub: Nada here in the report. Microsoft earlier this year said it acquired it for a very large sum of money(in stock), but it isn&t talking about it. But bucket it alongside Office 365 and LinkedIn as part of that increasingly large stable of productivity tools for businesses, as GitHub is one of the most widely adopted developer tools available.
- Details
- Category: Technology
Page 4682 of 5614