Music
Trailers
DailyVideos
India
Pakistan
Afghanistan
Bangladesh
Srilanka
Nepal
Thailand
StockMarket
Business
Technology
Startup
Trending Videos
Coupons
Football
Search
Download App in Playstore
Download App
Best Collections
Technology
You may remember the FCC explaining that in both 2014 and 2017, its comment system was briefly taken down by a denial of service attack. At least, so it says — but newly released emails show that the 2014 case was essentially fabricated, and the agency has so aggressively redacted documents relating to the 2017 incident that one suspects they&re hiding more than ordinary privileged information.
As a very quick recap: Shortly after the comment period opened for both net neutrality and the rollback of net neutrality there was a rush of activity that rendered the filing system unusable for a period of hours. This was corrected soon afterwards and the capacity of the system increased to cope with the increased traffic.
A report from Gizmodo based on more than 1,300 pages of emails obtained by watchdog group American Oversight shows that David Bray, the FCCchief information officer for a period encompassing both events, appears to have advanced the DDoS narrative with no real evidence or official support.
The 2014 event was not called an attack until much later, when Bray told reporters following the 2017 event that it was. &At the time the Chairman [i.e. Tom Wheeler] did not want to say there was a DDoS attack out of concern of copycats,& Bray wrote to a reporter at Federal News Radio. &So we accepted the punches that it somehow crashed because of volume even though actual comment volume wasn&t an issue.&
Gigi Sohn, who was Wheelercounsel at the time, put down this idea: &Thatjust flat out false,& she told Gizmodo. &We didn&t want to say it because Bray had no hard proof that it was a DDoS attack. Just like the second time.&
And it is the second time that is most suspicious. Differing on the preferred nomenclature for a four-year-old suspicious cyber event would not be particularly damning, but Braynarrative of a DDoS is hard to justify with the facts we do know.
In a blog post written in response to the report, Bray explained regarding the 2017 outage:
Whether the correct phrase is denial of service or &bot swarm& or &something hammering the Application Programming Interface& (API) of the commenting system — the fact is something odd was happening in May 2017.
Brayanalysis appears sincere, but the data he volunteers is highly circumstantial: large amounts of API requests that don&t match comment counts, for instance, or bunches of RSS requests that tie up the servers. Could it have been a malicious actor doing this Itpossible. Could it have been bad code hammering the servers with repeated or malformed requests Also totally possible. The FCCjustification for calling it an attack seems to be nothing more than a hunch.
Later the FCC, via then-CIO Bray, would categorize the event as a &non-traditional DDoS attack& flooding the API interface. But beyond that it has produced so little information of any import that Congress has had to re-issue its questions in stronger words.
No official documentation of either supposed attack has appeared, nor has the FCC released any data on it, even a year later and long after the comment period has closed, improvements to the system have been made and the CIO who evaded senators& questions departed.
But most suspicious is the extent to which the FCC redacted documents relating to the 2017 event. Having read through the trove of emails, Gizmodo concludes that &every internal conversation about the 2017 incident between FCC employees& has been redacted. Every one!
The FCC stated before that the &ongoing nature& of the threats to its systems meant it would &undermine our systemsecurity& to provide any details on the improvements it had made to mitigate future attacks. And Bray wrote in his post that there was no &full blown report& because the team was focused on getting the system up and running again. But there is also an FCC statement saying that &our analysis reveals& that a DDoS was the cause.
What analysis If itnot a &significant cyber incident,& as the FBI determined, why the secrecy If thereno report or significant analysis from the day — wrong or right in retrospect — what is sensitive about the emails that they have to be redacted en masse Bray himself wrote more technical details into his post than the FCC has offered in the year since the event — was this information sent to reporters at the time Was it redacted Why So little about this whole information play makes no sense.
One reasonable explanation (and just speculation, I should add) would be that the data do not support the idea of an attack, and internal discussions are an unflattering portrait of an agency doing spin work. The commitment to transparency that FCC Chairman Pai so frequently invokes is conspicuously absent in this specific case, and one has to wonder why.
The ongoing refusal to officially document or discuss what all seem to agree was an important event, whether ita DDoS or something else, is making the FCC look bad to just about everyone. No amount of redaction can change that.
- Details
- Category: Technology
Read more: FCC has a redaction party with emails relating to mystery attack on comment system
Write comment (98 Comments)Apple has one hardware-specific feature planned that wasn&t announced at MondayWWDC keynote. In iOS 12, users will be able to use Live Listen, a special feature previously reserved for hearing aids certified through AppleMade for iPhone hearing aid program, with their AirPods.
After enabling the feature in the iPhonesettings, users will be able to use their phones effectively as a directional mic. This means you can have AirPods in at a noisy restaurant with your iPhone on the table, for example, and the voice of whomever is speaking will be routed to your AirPods.
Live Listen is a feature Apple developed and eventually launched in 2014 that allows iPhone users with hearing aids to hear people in noisy environments or from across a room, such as a crowded restaurant or lecture hall. If a compatible hearing aid is paired to a userphone, there are options to turn Live Listen on and off, adjust volume and even set it as their preferred Accessibility Shortcut.
Live Listen support in AirPods is key. The inclusion of this feature makes AirPods more capable and more alluring; itsignificant given they are almost universally hailed as one of Applebest products in years. Soon, anyone — particularly someone with limited hearing — will have access to this feature without needing to buy dedicated hardware to get it.
Still, itcritical to note AirPods with Live Listen is not a full replacement for a hearing aid. Itobviously best to speak with your audiologist to determine the best solution for your ears.
- Details
- Category: Technology
Read more: AirPods to get Live Listen feature in iOS 12
Write comment (100 Comments)Amazon just got a step closer to world smart speaker domination. Starting today, users in France can pre-orderthe Echo, Echo Dot and Echo Spot. The standard Echo and Echo Dot will start shipping to users next week. The display-equipped Echo Spot will arrive at some point next month.
Naturally, the expansion also includes a French version of Alexa. As the company notes, the Alexa Skills Kit rolled out in March to French developers and device makers to prep for the expansion and create skills focused on the new market. After all, tweaking a smart assistant for a new market requires more than just learning a new language.
There are also a dialect and local customs to contend with, in order to offer the best possible experience. The skills that devs have built will also arrive later this month.
France joins a rapidly growing list of countries with Alexa/Echo, including the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Australia, India, New Zealand, Germany, Japan and Ireland. No word on availability for the rest of the Echo line. Google Home, meanwhile, has been available in France since last summer.
- Details
- Category: Technology
Read more: Amazon is bringing Alexa and Echo to France this month
Write comment (100 Comments)For the past decade, telecommunications companies around the globe have been grappling with falling average revenues per user equaling stagnant growth rates.
While particularly mobile operators have enabled increasing prosperity in third-world countries, new ways of working and fueled entirely new markets, much of the wealth created has landed on the books of companies that we look upon with increasing discomfort: Google, Amazon, Alibaba, Tencent and others. And as if this was not enough, the very ingredient — ubiquitous connectivity — that has served as lubricant for the disruption of entire industries is now on the verge of being disrupted itself.
While many expect finance or healthcare to be next on the list of global serial disruptors, and technologies like wearables, blockchain and AI are cited to be the nails in the coffins of these industries, small players have cooked up the ingredients that could well marginalize todayprevailing telco business models globally. There are three ingredients that could make that happen…
Lack of customer trust
Among the top 100 most trusted brands globally, you will find companies of almost any industry, except telco. You will find our serial disruptors, big brand consumer packaged goods, car manufacturers — even banks, payment companies and healthcare service providers. But you won&t find telcos. In their battle for growth, telcos globally have largely alienated their customers for the sake of managing yield and profitability.
Furthermore, simple customer engagement processes are often broken, and telcos have struggled to achieve a high quality of service with zero defects, high responsiveness and a great customer experience on even their most relevant customer interactions. They have broken the trust equation with their customers.
An existing trusted relationship is hard to disintermediate.
Why is that relevant Because trust is an important ingredient in disintermediation, à la Uber or Airbnb. Uber has put trust and ease into the car-hailing business, while Airbnb has put the trust in-between guest and host. On the flip side, an existing trusted relationship is hard to disintermediate.
However, the telco-customer relationship, as global brand indicators show, is ready to be disrupted. Perhaps even more so than the bank-client or doctor-patient relationships.
Liquid infrastructure
While telcos are grappling with fixing their customer front ends, becoming more nimble and responsive to customer needs and putting &greatness& back into the overall customer experience equation, small startups (and large telco suppliers alike) are creating what is known as &liquid infrastructures.&
In todaycloud-based world, global network traffic is exploding while traffic patterns, with globally scaled and load-balanced cloud-based back-ends, are becoming more and more fluid and less predictable. Likewise, decreasing enterprise assets actually connect to the enterprise network directly.
The internet of things (IoT) is creating massively distributed architectures with globally roaming assets that need to seamlessly blend into critical enterprise applications. So, enterprises are challenged with creating more flexible network infrastructures that not only connect their various operating sites, but also create reliable connections to public cloud service providers, while connecting remote and mobile IoT assets to the core network. And all that while accommodating massive shifts in traffic patterns depending on the day of the week, time of day or reconfigurations happening at service providers.
Liquid infrastructure promises to provide a solution for such challenges, and itnot a concept telcos are capable of, or offering, in the market place as of now. It is players like Waltz Networks, a venture-backed startup from San Francisco, that are disrupting the market place by providing solutions for the completely self-managed, liquid infrastructure that can handle todaynetwork demand.
Envision such an offering as a global OTT service and you have a recipe for a serious contender to the global enterprise telco services market.
&On the fly& mobile access
Redtea Mobile is another such interesting disruptor in the telco space. Imagine your IoT assets are roaming around the world globally. Which telco would you go to in order to buy a data plan, plus device management, which enables you to provision and deprovision your devices globally and on the fly
Telcos globally have been struggling to come up with competitive offerings that make managing such global asset bases economical and a breeze. That is firstly because none of the globally leading telcos can offer a truly global network — be it of their own or partner assets. Secondly, given multiple telcos are forced to collaborate if they want to offer a global virtual mobile data service, long-standing roaming agreements often stand in the way of economical pricing models. Telcos are not yet willing to sacrifice existing global roaming revenue at the expense of a potentially growing global IoT mobility data market opportunity.
Companies are better off disrupting than being disrupted.
Despite these challenges, however, the demand is increasing. While global mobile traffic was 7 exabytes in 2016, it will skyrocket 700 percent by 2021. Thatwhere Redtea Mobile comes into the picture. With Redtea Mobiletechnology, you could imagine someone buying regional capacity with enough associated international mobile subscriber identities (IMSI), the unique numbers assigned to mobile phone users, around the globe at wholesale prices, bundling this capacity as a global mobile IoT data service, and reselling it to enterprises globally to fuel their IoT devices.
The way Redtea Mobiletechnology works is that it can reprogram eSIMs on the fly from the cloud, so a device that operates on one mobile network in one country can be reprogrammed to another network on the fly once it crosses the border.
Both Redtea Mobile and Waltz Network enable the disintermediation of telcos, cutting out the expensive middle man. In the scenarios described above, the end-customer relationship would likely not reside with the telco, but with a service provider smartly repackaging core telco services with new technology into an over-the-top (OTT) service that completely marginalizes the telco to a pure infrastructure provider — much like the Uber drivers or the Airbnb property owners. And, as my first argument suggests, it is unlikely that many customers will bemoan the demise of global telcos as customer-facing service providers.
So what can telcos do
Enough cases have proven already that companies are better off disrupting than being disrupted.
True, telcos have one strength that is impossible to beat — they own assets that are hard, in most markets impossible, to replicate. However, while telcos will not vanish entirely, they run the risk of being completely marginalized. To prevent that, they should drive disruptive change of their own. While small companies are innovating, telcos could be at the forefront of deploying those technologies across their infrastructure and of developing new and innovative offerings that disrupt their prevailing products and business models on top of those technologies.
Will this be enough to win No, telcos will still have to fix the trust equation with their customers, become more responsive, etc.
But if telcos rely on their stagnant existing revenue streams and are too timid in embracing disruption, they are likely to continue their slow path toward the ultimate horror scenario of many telco executives: that of becoming a dump pipe.
- Details
- Category: Technology
Read more: The Uberization of telcos
Write comment (92 Comments)Herea heartfelt gift for all you procrastinating early-stage startup founders who haven&t gotten your act together to apply to compete in Startup Battlefield at Disrupt San Francisco 2018 on September 5-7. You&re strapped for time, we get it. So, we&re extending the application deadline by one week.
You now have until June 13 — thatseven days to collect your team and take your shot at winning $100,000. Yup, we doubled the prize money this year because we&re supersizing Disrupt SF. We&ve moved to Moscone Center West, which offers three times the floor space. That&ll make it much more comfortable for the more than 10,000 attendees, 1,200 exhibitors and more than 400 media outlets we expect to take in all that Disrupt has to offer.
Like, for example, Startup Battlefield — humanitybest launching pad for early-stage startups. Seriously, winning this gig can have life-altering implications. Consider New York-based chore wizard Hello Alfred, which won Startup Battlefield at Disrupt SF back in 2014. The company — founded byJessica BeckandMarcela Sapone — is ready to scale having just scored $40 million in a Series B round of funding. Thatwhat we call a good ROI.
In case you&re wondering how well other Battlefield competitors have fared, listen up. The Startup Battlefield alumni community consists of more than 800 companies and has collectively raised more than $8 billion in funding and produced more than 100 exits. You may recognize a few of them: Mint, Dropbox, Yammer, Fitbit, Getaround and Cloudflare. The networking opportunities alone make applying worth your time.
And letnot forget all the press and investor interest. The competition takes place on the Disrupt Main Stage in front of a live audience that numbers in the thousands. The funding you seek is no doubt sitting in that audience. If you make the cut, experienced TechCrunch editors will coach you on the finer points of startup-pitching, so you&ll make the best impression possible.
We live-stream the entire event around the world on TechCrunch.com, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter. And it&ll be available later, on demand. Remember, applying and competing in Startup Battlefield is 100 percent free. Where else will you find media and investor exposure at that price
Battlefield competitors also get to exhibit their company in Startup Alley for all three days of the show — for free. Remember all those attendees and media outlets They spend a lot of time combing the Alley for the next big thing. Competing in the Battlefield is the gift that keeps on giving.
Disrupt San Francisco 2018takes place onSeptember 5-7 at Moscone Center West. You have one extra week to get your application to us. Don&t delay any longer. Apply to Startup Battlefield right now.
- Details
- Category: Technology
Read more: Startup Battlefield application deadline extended by one week
Write comment (94 Comments)The Oculus Connect developer conference is back for its fifth year of chasing the VR dream.
Facebook VP or VR Hugo Barra announced that the companyvirtual reality-centric conference would be returning to San Jose on September 26 and 27. In past years, Oculus has used the conference to reveal its latest prototype hardware and to announce new software upgrades. This year, VR took center stage at FacebookF8 developer conference with the company using the event to launch the $199 Oculus Go standalone headset while also showcasing its latest prototype &Half Dome.&
It will be interesting to see what VR announcements are saved for Oculus at its own developer-centric event and whether they use the opportunity to talk more about prototypes like its positionally tracked &Santa Cruz& standalone, which they have discussed the development of for the past two years.
Registration details for OC5 aren&t available yet but the application has typically gone live in mid-summer.
- Details
- Category: Technology
Read more: Facebook announces Oculus Connect dates Sept. 26-27
Write comment (95 Comments)Page 5159 of 5614