Space is becoming a major area of startup and commercial investment, and so I&ve decided to start providing a weekly round-up of the biggest news in aerospace, space science and space-related technologies. Let me know if you appreciate this or have suggestions, and I&ll make sure it evolves as needed to be useful resource.

This week, there was an abundance of spacesuit news, and signs from multiple operators that theregoing to be an orbital traffic boom in the immediate future. Also, we&re heading into the annual International Astronautical Congress (IAC) this coming week, so expect a lot more news starting tomorrow.

1. NASA unveils its Artemis-generation spacesuits

NASA showed off a brand new generation of spacesuit, including the one that the first American woman and next American man to set foot on the Moon will don for that historic moment. The new Artemis suits are designed to scale from essentially the smallest to the largest possible adult human frame, which NASA touts as a way to make the astronaut program more accessible to a wider range of Americans. The agency should be going out of its way to fix that, because of what happened that led to item #2 this week.

For the first time, NASA is looking to outsource the full production of these Artemis-generation spacesuits (including the Orion survival suit, which was also revealed today and will be worn only during flight aboard the Orion capsule). To that end, it has put out a request for input from industry about their design and development ahead of setting up a proper RFP.

2. NASA astronauts Christina H. Koch and Jessica Meir complete historic first all-woman spacewalk

EHJxl5XW4AAu3PN 2

NASA astronauts Christina H. Koch and Jessica Meir

As I alluded above, there was a very good reason that NASA really emphasized how inclusive its Artemis suit designs are: The agency had to cancel a first all-woman spacewalk earlier this year because it didn&t have the right amount of properly sized spacesuitson board the International Space Station. It sent one up in June, however, and that historic moment happened this past week, with Koch and Meir performing a roughly seven-hour spacewalk to repair a power controller.

3. SpaceX applies for permission to launch 30,000 more Starlink satellites

Thaton top of the 12,000 italready had cleared, which makes for a total potential constellation size of 42,000. Thatabout 8x the number of satellites currently in orbit, across all orbital zones. Ita move that is definitely raising the ire of both industry and space researchers, because it&ll make it a lot more complicated to ensure orbital spacecraft avoid collisions, and it could potentially obscure the view of the stars from Earth. SpaceX says it has taken steps to ensure it can avoid both problems, but not everyone is convinced.

4. Swarm gets the ‘OK& for its 150-satellite constellation

Max-Q: This week in space Meanwhile, startup Swarm has been granted FCC approval to deploy its own, much-smaller constellation of 150 satellites. Swarm isn&t competing directly with SpaceXStarlink & it wants to provide low-bandwidth IoT connectivity. And while it isn&t looking to put up a huge volume of spacecraft, there was some concern that its toaster-sized satellites might be too small to track and present a risk that way.

5. Rocket Labswap launch is a success

New Zealand-born and lately U.S.-headquartered Rocket Lab was successful in launching its fifth Electron rocket this year. The startupsuccess was more a proof point for its business model than its technology, however, since the payload that flew aboard this mission was actually one that wasn&t slated to go up until much later in the queue. Rocket Laboriginal client for this one had to drop out due to unfortunate circumstances, and Rocket Lab was able to get client Astro Digital an earlier ride. This kind of late-stage payload swap has not typically been a strength of the established commercial space launch industry.

6. Under Armour built some fancy tracksuits for space

Max-Q: This week in space Richard BransonVirgin Galactic will begin ferrying wealthy paying tourists to the very edge of space next year, if all goes to plan, and now we know what they&ll be wearing when they do: Under Armour. The sportswear company and Bransonspace enterprise unveiled the new suits at a flashy special event featuring the first tourists who have reserved $250,000 tickets aboard Virgin Galactic atmosphere-skimming spacecraft.

7. How Lockheed MartinVenture arm spends its $200 million in available funding

Lockheed Martin has been in the commercial space business since there has been a commercial space business to be in, and around a decade ago it established a corporate venture fund to make strategic bets on startups. I sat down with the fundGM and Executive Director J. Christopher Moran to talk about what the fund looks for in startups & and the industry giant is a lot more interested in early stage companies that you might have thought. Extra Crunch Subscription required.

Write comment (90 Comments)

Hey everyone. Thank you for welcoming me into you inbox yet again.

Last week, I talked about the eternal dumbness of the smart home and how Google had a big chance to lay out their vision this past week. Guess what? They did not, instead we got a new more expensive Google Wifi that falls under the Nest brand as well as a Google Mini that can be wall-mounted…

If you&re reading this on the TechCrunch site, you can get this in your inboxhere, and follow my tweetshere.


The big story

Zuckerberg had an interesting week, delivering a very rehearsed keynote that was neither in front of Congress or an audience of developers at F8. He spoke at Georgetown on the topic of free speech and Facebookbrand of capitalism.

It was an odd speech, but it was an opportunity for him to speak at length about what he saw as Facebookmission in terms of free speech

&These two simple ideas — voice and inclusion — go hand in hand. We&ve seen this throughout history, even if it doesn&t feel that way today. More people being able to share their perspectives has always been necessary to build a more inclusive society. And our mutual commitment to each other — that we hold each others& right to express our views and be heard above our own desire to always get the outcomes we want — is how we make progress together.

But this view is increasingly being challenged. Some people believe giving more people a voice is driving division rather than bringing us together. More people across the spectrum believe that achieving the political outcomes they think matter is more important than every person having a voice. I think thatdangerous. Today I want to talk about why, and some important choices we face around free expression.

Throughout history, we&ve seen how being able to use your voice helps people come together. We&ve seen this in the civil rights movement. Frederick Douglass once called free expression &the great moral renovator of society&. He said &slavery cannot tolerate free speech&. Civil rights leaders argued time and again that their protests were protected free expression, and one noted: &nearly all the cases involving the civil rights movement were decided on First Amendment grounds&.

Facebook is in an interesting position here, where they&re tying a moral stance with an economic one. They seem to draw the line at paid ads and paid political speech whereas everything before it was so nuanced. I don&t like that very much.

Unrestricted speech on the internet has been an evolving topic. Therethe very real argument that giving people a megaphone to harass and bully minimizes other peopleability to have unrestricted speech themselves. Facebook and most of the other major platforms have agreed with this and have put policies in place.

Therealso the situation where someone is threatening or discussing violence or hate speech. Again, Facebook goes further than the law requires and has this firmly in their policies.

If you look at the companyexisting policies that have been put in place over the past few years, you would find plenty of guidelines at odds with sections of Zuckspeech and yet he seemed to be drawing a big red line here and now, with the only reason being the criticism of Facebookad policy that allowed Donald Trump to pay for and target ads that were ostensibly untrue.

I wrote about the situation in full here and it rings true again after Zuckerbergspeech. Timing is everything and ithard to take this moral stance seriously right now especially.

Facebook sure does love free $peech

Send me feedback on Twitter@lucasmtnyor email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

On to the rest of the weeknews.

Week in Review: The webfree speech conundrum

(Photo by Steve Sands/WireImage)

Trends of the week

Here are a few big news items from big companies, with green links to all the sweet, sweet added context:

  • Sprint + T-Mobile = official best friends The FCC has reportedly decided to let another massive merger go through (after some decent concessions), allowing T-Mobile and Sprint to proceed in their massive telecom merger.
  • Switch sales surgeNintendo has already made a major splash with the Switch, but the traction itgaining in North America has already eclipsed its last-gen systemworldwide unit sales. Check out their latest milestone.
  • Justice Dept takes down a massive child exploitation site The government infiltrated and clamped down on a massive child exploitation dark web site this week and my colleague Zack has the full rundown.

Week in Review: The webfree speech conundrum

GAFA Gaffes

How did the top tech companies screw up this week? This clearly needs its own section, in order of badness:

  1. $35B lawsuit against FB can move forward:[$35 billion face lawsuit against Facebook can proceed]
  2. AOC and Ted criticize Apple:[AppleChina stance makes for strange political alliances as AOC and Ted Cruz slam the company]

Sign up for more newsletters in your inbox (including this one)here.

Write comment (94 Comments)

Welcome to TechCrunchChina roundup, a digest of events that happened at major Chinese tech companies and what they mean to tech founders and executives around the world.

The talk about U.S.-China relationships over the past two weeks has centered heavily on the NBA controversy, which has put the interest of some of Chinalargest tech firms at stake. Last week, Houston Rockets general manager Daryl Morey voiced support for Hong Kong protests in his since-deleted tweet, angering ChinaNBA fans and prompting a raft of local tech companies to sever ties with the league. But some businesses seem to be back on track.

Tencent, which is famous for a slew of internet products, including WeChat and its Netflix-like video service, has been NBAexclusive streaming partner since 2009 and recently renewed the deal through the 2024-25 season. As many as 490 million fans in China watched NBA programming through Tencent in just one season this year, the pair claims.

The basketball games are clearly a driver of ad revenue and subscribers for Tencent amid fierce competition in Chinavideo streaming market, but following Moreystatement, the company swiftly announced (in Chinese) it would suspend portions of its broadcast arrangements with the NBA. Popular smartphone brand Vivo and Starbuckslocal challenger Luckin also promised to pause collaboration with the NBA.

It was a tough call for businesses having to choose between economic interest and patriotism, and Tencent was tactful in its response, pledging only to &temporarily& halt the streaming of NBA &preseason games (China).& As public anger subsided over the week, Tencent resumed airing NBA preseason games on Monday. After all, the content partnership reportedly cost Tencent a heavy sum of $1.5 billion.

Entertainment giant turns to education

tiktok edutok

TikTok is probably the Chinese Internet service being most closely watched by the world at the moment. Its parent firm ByteDance, last reportedly valued at $75 billion, has ambitions beyond short videos.

This week, more details emerged on the upstarteducation endeavors through a WeChat post by Musical.ly founder Lulu Yang, whose short-video startup was acquired by ByteDance and subsequently merged with TikTok. Yang confirmed he was helping ByteDance to develop an education device in collaboration with phone maker Smartisanformer hardware team, which ByteDance has absorbed. The product, which leverages ByteDance artificial intelligence capabilities, will be a &robotic learning companion& for K-12 students to use at home.

The news arrived in the same week that ByteDanceflagship video app TikTok announced producing educational content for India, where itused by 200 million people every month. The move is designed to assuage local officials who have vehemently slammed TikTok for hosting illicit content, as my colleague Manish Singh pointed out.

Diving into education appears to be a sensible move for ByteDance to build relationships with local authorities, which can at times find its entertainment-focused content problematic. The multi-billion-dollar online education industry is also highly lucrative. ByteDance, with 1.5 billion daily users across TikTok, Douyin (TikTok for China), Toutiao news aggregator and other new media apps, is in a good position to monetize the enormous base by touting new services, whether they are educational content or mobile games.

Also worth your time

  • A total of 53 major video streaming services in China have introduced a &safe mode& for teenagers as of this week, state media reported (in Chinese). During the controls mode, underage users won&t be able to search for content, send real-time comments or private messages, upload or share videos, or reward live streaming hosts with virtual gifts. Itpart of Chinanational effort to protect young people from consuming harmful digital content and internet addiction, which has also spawned age checks processes in Tencent games.
  • Xiaohongshu, a fast-growing social commerce app in China, is back in Android app stores nearly three months after it was banned by the government for undisclosed reasons. Rumors had it that the service, which was reportedly valued at more than $2.5 billion last year, was used to spread pornography and fake reviews. Ithardly the first tech company hit by media regulation, and it can probably learn a thing or two from ByteDance, which has aggressively ramped up its content moderation force following a sequence of crackdowns by the government.
  • Meituan will partner with 1,000 vocational schools in the country to train as many as 100 million workers from the service industry over the next ten years, the Hong Kong-listed company announced (in Chinese) this week. Food delivery makes up the bulk of the on-demand services giantbusiness but its footprint spans a wide range. The classes it provides to prepare workers for a digital era will also touch upon skincare, hair styling, manicure, plastic surgery, hospitality and parenting, a program highlighting the extensive reach of technology into Chinese peopleevery life.
  • Chinese workers turn out to be big advocates for the application of AI. According to a survey by Oracle and research firm Future Workplace, workers in India (60 percent) and China (56 percent) are the most excited about AI. Japan, where the labor force is shrinking, ranks surprisingly low (25 percent), and the U.S. has an equally mild reaction (22 percent) toward the technology.

Write comment (99 Comments)

This week Mark Zuckerberg gave a speech in which he extolled &giving everyone a voice& and fighting &to uphold a wide a definition of freedom of expression as possible.& That sounds great, of course! Freedom of expression is a cornerstone, if not the cornerstone, of liberal democracy. Who could be opposed to that?

The problem is that Facebook doesn&t offer free speech; it offers free amplification. No one would much care about anything you posted to Facebook, no matter how false or hateful, if people had to navigate to your particular page to read your rantings, as in the very early days of the site.

But what people actually read on Facebook is whatin their News Feed … and its contents, in turn, are determined not by giving everyone an equal voice, and not by a strict chronological timeline. What you read on Facebook is determined entirely by Facebookalgorithm, which elides much — censors much, if you wrongly think the News Feed is free speech — and amplifies little.

What is amplified? Two forms of content. For native content, the algorithm optimizes for engagement. This in turn means people spend more time on Facebook, and therefore more time in the company of that other form of content which is amplified: paid advertising.

Of course this isn&t absolute. As Zuckerberg notes in his speech, Facebook works to stop things like hoaxes and medical misinformation from going viral, even if they&re otherwise anointed by the algorithm. But he has specifically decided that Facebook will not attempt to stop paid political misinformation from going viral.

I personally disagree with this decision, but I think itsomething about which reasonable people can disagree. However I find it deeply disingenuous to claim that this is somehow about defending free speech. If someone were to try to place a blatantly false political ad on any platform or network, would anyone seriously consider a decision not to run that ad an attack on free speech? Of course not. And they shouldn&t take the converse argument seriously either.

The larger issue, though, is that Facebook seems to think that if an algorithm is content-agnostic, it is therefore fair. When Zuckerberg talks about giving people a voice, he really means giving those people selected by Facebookalgorithm a voice. When he says &People having the power to express themselves at scale is a new kind of force in the world — a Fifth Estate,& what he actually means is that Facebookalgorithm is itself that Fifth Estate.

The belief is apparently that any human judgement based on content beyond the absolute minimum required by law and implied by the social contract — i.e. filtering out hate speech, abuses, or dangerous medical misinformation, all of which he stresses in his speech — is dangerous and wrong, and that this goes for both native content and paid advertising. According to this belief, Facebookalgorithm, so long as it is content-agnostic, is definitionally fair.

And that belief is just flat-out wrong. As we&ve all seen, &optimizing for engagement& all too often means optimizing for outrage, for polarization, for disingenuous misinformation. True, it doesn&t mean favoring any side of any given issue; but it does mean favoring the extremes, the conspiracy theorists, the histrionic diatribes on all sides. It means fomenting mistrust, suspicion, and conflict everywhere. We&ve all seen it. We&ve all lived it.

Facebookdecision to accept political ads regardless of content is essentially a logical extension of how their algorithm optimizes for engagement. It speaks to their belief that as long as they don&t pass judgement based on content, their ongoing, ceaseless editing of what people see and don&t see — and please call it censorship if you think this is any way about freedom of speech — is therefore fair and just. This belief was defensible ten or even five years ago. It is not defensible today.

But it is also not going to change. Facebookoriginal sin is not political ads; it is optimizing for engagement so that their users see more ads of all kinds. Thatwhat needs to change for Facebook to become a positive force in the world … and italso what never will, because that engagement is the fundamental engine of their business model.

Write comment (94 Comments)

Earlier this month at TechCrunch Disrupt San Francisco, we sat down with BoxAaron Levie and PagerDuty Jennifer Tejada to discuss their respective companies& paths to an IPO, the general IPO landscape and the pros and cons of going public. With a lot of recent IPOs faltering and increased pressure on startup valuations, now is as good a time as ever to think about the role IPOs play in a companylifespan.

&I think itreally important to think of the IPOs, the beginning, not the end,& said Tejada. &We all live in Silicon Valley and that can be a little bit of an echo chamber and you talk about exits all the time. The IPO is an entrance, right? It is part of the beginning of a long journey for a durable company that you want to build a legacy around. And so, it is a moment — itthe start of you really sharing a narrative backed by financial data to help people understand your current business, the potential for your business, the market that you&re in, etc. And I think we tend to talk about it like itthe be-all end-all.&

Thatsomething Levie definitely agrees with. &I think we have too much of a fixation on the IPO moment versus just building durable business models and how do they end up translating into valuations. The valuation that you get at an IPO is due to variety factors.&

GettyImages 1178603646

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA & OCTOBER 02: (L-R) PagerDuty CEO - Chairperson Jennifer Tejada, Box Co-Founder/Chairman - CEO Aaron Levie, and TechCrunch Writer Frederic Lardinois speak onstage during TechCrunch Disrupt San Francisco 2019 at Moscone Convention Center on October 02, 2019 in San Francisco, California. (Photo by Steve Jennings/Getty Images for TechCrunch)

Itno secret that Box and PagerDuty had very different experiences as they got ready to go public. Box announced its S-1 only a few days before a major market crash back in 2014. PagerDuty, on the other hand, went public earlier this year, with solid financials and very little drama.

Tejada, in many ways, attributed that to the work she and her team did to get the company ready for this moment. &I get asked a lot by CEOs that are thinking about getting ready to go public, ‘you know, what was your playbook? How do you do this?& And I think instead of thinking about whatthe playbook, you need to be intellectually honest about what your business looks like,& she said. In her view, CEOs need to focus on the leading indicators for their business — the ones they want the market to understand. But she also noted that the market needs to understand a companypotential in the long run.

&You want to make sure that the market understands where you think the business can go and gets excited about it, but that they don&t over-rotate in their expectations, because dealing with really high expectations creates a lot of downstream difficulty.&

Write comment (95 Comments)
Oppo A9 2020

Proving you don't need to spend big bucks in order to get your hands on premium smartphone features, Oppo's supremely affordable A 2020 series offers massive battery life and quad cameras for less than AU$400.

Available from October 28 starting at AU$399, the Oppo A9 2020 sports an impressive quad camera setup that includes a 48MP main camera, an

Write comment (100 Comments)